Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Which Is the Best Device as Bridge to Heart Transplantation?
| Autor: | Hette AN; Faculdade de Medicina, Centro Universitário Faculdade das Américas, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil., Sobral MLP; Faculdade de Medicina, Centro Universitário Faculdade das Américas, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.; Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery [Braz J Cardiovasc Surg] 2022 Oct 08; Vol. 37 (5), pp. 737-743. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Oct 08. |
| DOI: | 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0562 |
| Abstrakt: | Introduction: Heart transplantation is the recommended treatment method for patients with advanced heart failure that is refractory to clinical treatment. Due to the progressive severity of these patients and the impossibility of performing the transplant in a short term, there are mechanical circulatory assist devices that can offer necessary hemodynamic support and clinical stability in the period preceding the heart transplant surgery. The present study aims to address and describe the main devices used as bridges for heart transplantation, as well as to analyze their advantages and disadvantages. Methods: This work is a literature review, developed with scientific production in the period from 2010 to 2020, that focus on circulatory assist devices as a bridge for heart transplantation. Results: These devices are characterized as a bridge for transplantation. Short-term or temporary devices are those used for hemodynamic support to stabilize the individual clinically in the presence of refractory cardiogenic shock. And long-term devices are indicated for stable patients with long-term strategic planning. Conclusion: According to the present study, it is possible to observe that there is a wide variety of devices available on the market, enabling the most appropriate choice according to the patient's need. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|