Replication of SARS-CoV-2 in cell lines used in public health surveillance programmes with special emphasis on biosafety.

Autor: Pawar SD; Poliovirus Group, ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune; ICMR-National Institute of Virology-Mumbai Unit, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India., Kode SS; Poliovirus Group, ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune, Maharashtra, India., Keng SS; Poliovirus Group, ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune, Maharashtra, India., Tare DS; Poliovirus Group, ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune, Maharashtra, India., Diop OM; World Health Organization Headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland., Abraham P; ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune, Maharashtra, India., Sharma DK; ICMR-National Institute of Virology-Mumbai Unit, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India., Sangal L; Regional Office for South-East Asia, World Health Organization, New Delhi, India., Yadav PD; Maximum Containment Laboratory, ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune, Maharashtra, India., Potdar VA; Human Influenza Group, ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: The Indian journal of medical research [Indian J Med Res] 2022 Jan; Vol. 155 (1), pp. 129-135.
DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_1448_21
Abstrakt: Background & Objectives: Polio, measles, rubella, influenza and rotavirus surveillance programmes are of great public health importance globally. Virus isolation using cell culture is an integral part of such programmes. Possibility of unintended isolation of SARS-CoV-2 from clinical specimens processed in biosafety level-2 (BSL-2) laboratories during the above-mentioned surveillance programmes, cannot be ruled out. The present study was conducted to assess the susceptibility of different cell lines to SARS-CoV-2 used in these programmes.
Methods: Replication of SARS-CoV-2 was studied in RD and L20B, Vero/hSLAM, MA-104 and Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cell lines, used for the isolation of polio, measles, rubella, rotavirus and influenza viruses, respectively. SARS-CoV-2 at 0.01 multiplicity of infection was inoculated and the viral growth was assessed by observation of cytopathic effects followed by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Vero CCL-81 cell line was used as a positive control.
Results: SARS-CoV-2 replicated in Vero/hSLAM, and MA-104 cells, whereas it did not replicate in L20B, RD and MDCK cells. Vero/hSLAM, and Vero CCL-81 showed rounding, degeneration and detachment of cells; MA-104 cells also showed syncytia formation. In qRT-PCR, Vero/hSLAM and MA-104 showed 10 6 and Vero CCL-81 showed 10 7 viral RNA copies per μl. The 50 per cent tissue culture infectious dose titres of Vero/hSLAM, MA-104 and Vero CCL-81 were 10 5.54 , 10 5.29 and 10 6.45 /ml, respectively.
Interpretation & Conclusions: Replication of SARS-CoV-2 in Vero/hSLAM and MA-104 underscores the possibility of its unintended isolation during surveillance procedures aiming to isolate measles, rubella and rotavirus. This could result in accidental exposure to high titres of SARS-CoV-2, which can result in laboratory acquired infections and community risk, highlighting the need for revisiting biosafety measures in public health laboratories.
Databáze: MEDLINE