| Autor: |
Papadopoulou ES; Laboratory of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.; Laboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece., Bachtsevani E; Laboratory of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece., Papazlatani CV; Laboratory of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece., Rousidou C; Laboratory of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece., Brouziotis A; Laboratory of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece., Lampronikou E; Laboratory of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece., Tsiknia M; Laboratory of Soils and Agricultural Chemistry, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Greece., Vasileiadis S; Laboratory of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece., Ipsilantis I; Laboratory of Soil Sciences, School of Agriculture, Forestry and Environment, Faculty of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece., Menkissoglu-Spiroudi U; Pesticide Science Laboratory, School of Agriculture, Forestry and Environment, Faculty of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece., Ehaliotis C; Laboratory of Soils and Agricultural Chemistry, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Greece., Philippot L; Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, INRAE, AgroSup Dijon, Agroécologie, Dijon, France., Nicol GW; Environmental Microbial Genomics Group, Laboratoire Ampère, École Centrale de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5005, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France., Karpouzas DG; Laboratory of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece. |
| Abstrakt: |
Dicyandiamide (DCD) and nitrapyrin (NP) are nitrification inhibitors (NIs) used in agriculture for over 40 years. Recently, ethoxyquin (EQ) was proposed as a novel potential NI, acting through its derivative quinone imine (QI). Still, the specific activity of these NIs on the different groups of ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms (AOM), and mostly their effects on other soil microbiota remain unknown. We determined the impact of QI, and comparatively of DCD and NP, applied at two doses (regular versus high), on the function, diversity, and dynamics of target (AOM), functionally associated (nitrite-oxidizing bacteria-NOB), and off-target prokaryotic and fungal communities in two soils mainly differing in pH (5.4 versus 7.9). QI was equally effective to DCD but more effective than NP in inhibiting nitrification in the acidic soil, while in the alkaline soil QI was less efficient than DCD and NP. This was attributed to the higher activity of QI toward AOA prevailing in the acidic soil. All NIs induced significant effects on the composition of the AOB community in both soils, unlike AOA, which were less responsive. Beyond on-target effects, we noted an inhibitory effect of all NIs on the abundance of NOB in the alkaline soil, with Nitrobacter being more sensitive than Nitrospira . QI, unlike the other NIs, induced significant changes in the composition of the bacterial and fungal communities in both soils. Our findings have serious implications for the efficiency and future use of NIs on agriculture and provide unprecedented evidence for the potential off-target effects of NIs on soil microbiota. IMPORTANCE NIs could improve N use efficiency and decelerate N cycling. Still, we know little about their activity on the distinct AOM groups and about their effects on off-target soil microorganisms. Here, we studied the behavior of a new potent NI, QI, compared to established NIs. We show that (i) the variable efficacy of NIs across soils with different pH reflects differences in the inherent specific activity of the NIs to AOA and AOB; (ii) beyond AOM, NIs exhibit negative effects on other nitrifiers, like NOB; (iii) QI was the sole NI that significantly affected prokaryotic and fungal diversity. Our findings (i) highlight the need for novel NI strategies that consider the variable sensitivity of AOM groups to the different NIs (ii) identify QI as a potent AOA inhibitor, and (iii) stress the need for monitoring NIs' impact on off-target soil microorganisms to ensure sustainable N fertilizers use and soil ecosystem functioning. |
