Characterizing the external exposome using passive samplers-comparative assessment of chemical exposures using different wearable form factors.

Autor: Lin EZ; Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA., Nichols A; Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA., Zhou Y; Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA., Koelmel JP; Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA., Godri Pollitt KJ; Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA. krystal.pollitt@yale.edu.; Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. krystal.pollitt@yale.edu.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology [J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol] 2023 Jul; Vol. 33 (4), pp. 558-565. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jul 15.
DOI: 10.1038/s41370-022-00456-3
Abstrakt: Background: Organic contaminants are released into the air from building materials/furnishings, personal care, and household products. Wearable passive samplers have emerged as tools to characterize personal chemical exposures. The optimal placement of these samplers on an individual to best capture airborne exposures has yet to be evaluated.
Objective: To compare personal exposure to airborne contaminants detected using wearable passive air samplers placed at different positions on the body.
Methods: Participants (n = 32) simultaneously wore four passive Fresh Air samplers, on their head, chest, wrist, and foot for 24 hours. Exposure to 56 airborne organic contaminants was evaluated using thermal desorption gas chromatography high resolution mass spectrometry with a targeted data analysis approach.
Results: Distinct exposure patterns were detected by samplers positioned on different parts of the body. Chest and wrist samplers were the most similar with correlations identified for 20% of chemical exposures (Spearman's Rho > 0.8, p < 0.05). In contrast, the greatest differences were found for head and foot samplers with the weakest correlations across evaluated exposures (8% compounds, Spearman's Rho > 0.8, p < 0.05).
Significance: The placement of wearable passive air samplers influences the exposures captured and should be considered in future exposure and epidemiological studies.
Impact Statement: Traditional approaches for assessing personal exposure to airborne contaminants with active samplers presents challenges due to their cost, size, and weight. Wearable passive samplers have recently emerged as a non-invasive, lower cost tool for measuring environmental exposures. While these samplers can be worn on different parts of the body, their position can influence the type of exposure that is captured. This study comprehensively evaluates the exposure to airborne chemical contaminants measured at different passive sampler positions worn on the head, chest, wrist, and foot. Findings provide guidance on sampler placement based on chemicals and emission sources of interest.
(© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: