On vagueness and parochialism in psychological research on groups.
| Autor: | Ratner KG; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA93106, USA kyle.ratner@psych.ucsb.eduhttps://spl.psych.ucsb.edu., Hamilton DL; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA93106, USA kyle.ratner@psych.ucsb.eduhttps://spl.psych.ucsb.edu., Brewer MB; Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH43210, USA. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | The Behavioral and brain sciences [Behav Brain Sci] 2022 Jul 07; Vol. 45, pp. e119. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jul 07. |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S0140525X21001369 |
| Abstrakt: | Pietraszewski asserts that social psychological research on groups is too vague, tautological, and dependent on intuitions to be theoretically useful. We disagree. Pietraszewski's contribution is thought-provoking but also incomplete and guilty of many of the faults he attributes to others. Instead of rototilling the existing knowledge landscape, we urge for more integration of new and old ideas. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|