Retained Diabetes Devices-A Literature Review.
Autor: | Xu NY; Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, CA, USA., Nguyen KT; Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, CA, USA., Krouwer JS; Krouwer Consulting, Sherborn, MA, USA., Akturk HK; Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA., Shah VN; Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA., Klonoff DC; Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, CA, USA. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Journal of diabetes science and technology [J Diabetes Sci Technol] 2023 Nov; Vol. 17 (6), pp. 1676-1685. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jul 05. |
DOI: | 10.1177/19322968221105895 |
Abstrakt: | Background: Diabetes management and treatment requires the use of many devices that frequently must puncture the skin, creating a risk of unintentional retention in the body as a retained diabetes device. In this article, we reviewed case studies about retained diabetes devices and presented analyses of the success rate of current imaging techniques in identifying retained devices and the success rate of device removal. Methods: PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for articles about retained diabetes devices. Relevant articles that included sufficient details about discovery and removal of the device were included. The success rate of identification and the success rate of removal of retained devices were both calculated as percentages. Results: Sixteen case studies of retained diabetes devices were identified. These devices included parts of continuous glucose monitors and infusion sets, a lancet, and various types of needles for insulin injection. Each case is presented with details about the year of publication, the retained diabetes device, the company that produced the device, the age and gender of the patient, the type of diabetes that the patient had, the location of the device, the reason for initial discovery of the retained device, the process of locating the device, the success rate for removal of the device, and the removal procedure of the device. Analysis revealed a 100% success rate for the use of imaging technology including X-rays and computed tomography to identify a retained diabetes device. The patients with retained diabetes devices had a 62.5% success rate for eventual removal of the device. Conclusions: With the increasing use of injected, inserted, and implanted diabetes wearables for digital health, it is likely that some of the devices will detach, break apart, or otherwise become retained in the body. It is important to be aware of available technologies to identify retained diabetes devices so that it will be possible in most cases to surgically remove these devices if they detach or become retained. Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |