| Autor: |
Cai YQ; The Third Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China., Zeng HQ; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361004,China., Li YP; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361004,China., Li NS; The Third Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China., Zheng YT; The Third Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China., Lai XX; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361004,China., Chen X; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361004,China. |
| Abstrakt: |
Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) has been a major public health issue all over the world, placing a significant burden on available healthcare resources. The most common types of COVID-19 are the mild and common forms. Although the proportion of the severe-critical types is smaller, the rate of death is significantly higher and the medical resources required tend to be greater. Thus, a variety of scores based on other disease and COVID-19 were used to assess the risk of poor prognosis on the COVID-19, including the common scores for community-acquired pneumonia, sepsis and viral pneumonia. Unfortunately, the above scores often lacked an adequate description of the applicable population or were at high risk of bias with unknown applicability. Therefore, the article summarized the existing scores, aiming to provide a reference for clinical prognostic risk assessment. |
