Imaging biomarkers of breast cancers originating from the major lactiferous ducts: Ductal adenocarcinoma of the breast, DAB.

Autor: Tabár L; Falun Central Hospital, Lasarettsvägen 10, 791 82 Falun, Sweden. Electronic address: laszlo@mammographyed.com., Dean PB; University of Turku, FI-20014 Turun Yliopisto, Finland., Lee Tucker F; Virginia Biomedical Laboratories, Wirtz, VA, USA., Chen TH; Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, 17 Hsuchow Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan., Smith RA; American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA., Duffy SW; Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK., Chiu SY; Department of Health Care Management, College of Management, and Healthy Aging Research Center, Chang Gung University, 259, Wenhua 1st Rd, Taoyuan City 333, Taiwan., Ku MM; Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, 17 Hsuchow Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan., Fan CY; Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, 17 Hsuchow Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan., Yen AM; School of Oral Hygiene, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Wuxing Street, Taipei 110, Taiwan.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: European journal of radiology [Eur J Radiol] 2022 Sep; Vol. 154, pp. 110394. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jun 04.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110394
Abstrakt: Purpose: As we have previously demonstrated, breast cancers originating in the major lactiferous ducts and propagating through the process of neoductgenesis are a distinct subtype of invasive breast cancers, although by current practice they are placed within the group termed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and are consequently underdiagnosed and undertreated. Imaging biomarkers provide a reliable indication of the site of origin of this breast cancer subtype (Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the breast, DAB) and have excellent concordance with long-term patient outcome. In the present paper, the imaging biomarkers of DAB are described in detail to encourage and facilitate its recognition as a distinct, invasive breast cancer subtype.
Methods: Correlation of breast imaging biomarkers with the corresponding histopathological findings using large format technology, with additional evidence from subgross, thick section histopathology to demonstrate the complex three-dimensional structure of the newly formed duct-like structures, neoducts.
Results: There are six imaging biomarkers (mammographic tumour features) of DAB. Four subgroups have characteristic malignant-type calcifications on the mammogram. Two of these are characterized by intraluminal necrosis producing fragmented or dotted casting type calcifications on the mammogram; another two subgroups are characterized by intraductal fluid production which may eventually calcify, producing skipping stone-like or string of pearl-like calcifications. A fifth DAB subgroup presents with bloody or serous nipple discharge and is usually occult on mammography but is detectable with galactography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The sixth subgroup presents as architectural distortion on the mammogram without associated calcifications.
Conclusions: Radiologists can use these well-defined imaging biomarkers to readily detect Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Breast, DAB. Immunochemical biomarkers are generally not determined from the DAB itself, due to the erroneous assumption that DAB is non-invasive. MRI plays a crucial role in determining disease extent and guiding surgical management. The accumulating evidence that this disease subtype is, in fact, an invasive cancer, necessitates an urgent re-evaluation of the diagnostic and management criteria for this poorly understood malignancy.
(Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE