| Autor: |
Turner NP; Centre for Children's Health Research (CCHR), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 62 Graham St., South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia.; Faculty of Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Kelvin Grove Campus, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Victoria Park Rd., Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia., Abeysinghe P; Centre for Children's Health Research (CCHR), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 62 Graham St., South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia.; Faculty of Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Kelvin Grove Campus, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Victoria Park Rd., Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia., Kwan Cheung KA; Centre for Children's Health Research (CCHR), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 62 Graham St., South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia.; Faculty of Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Kelvin Grove Campus, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Victoria Park Rd., Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia., Vaswani K; Centre for Children's Health Research (CCHR), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 62 Graham St., South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia., Logan J; Centre for Children's Health Research (CCHR), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 62 Graham St., South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia.; Faculty of Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Kelvin Grove Campus, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Victoria Park Rd., Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia., Sadowski P; Central Analytical Research Facility (CARF), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 2 George St., Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia., Mitchell MD; Centre for Children's Health Research (CCHR), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 62 Graham St., South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia.; Faculty of Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Kelvin Grove Campus, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Victoria Park Rd., Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia. |
| Abstrakt: |
Proteomic analysis of small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) poses a significant challenge. A 'gold-standard' method for plasma sEV enrichment for downstream proteomic analysis is yet to be established. Methods were evaluated for their capacity to successfully isolate and enrich sEVs from plasma, minimise the presence of highly abundant plasma proteins, and result in the optimum representation of sEV proteins by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Plasma from four cattle (Bos taurus) of similar physical attributes and genetics were used. Three methods of sEV enrichment were utilised: ultracentrifugation (UC), size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), and ultrafiltration (UF). These methods were combined to create four groups for methodological evaluation: UC + SEC, UC + SEC + UF, SEC + UC and SEC + UF. The UC + SEC method yielded the highest number of protein identifications (IDs). The SEC + UC method reduced plasma protein IDs compared to the other methods, but also resulted in the lowest number of protein IDs overall. The UC + SEC + UF method decreased sEV protein ID, particle number, mean and mode particle size, particle yield, and did not improve purity compared to the UC + SEC method. In this study, the UC + SEC method was the best method for sEV protein ID, purity, and overall particle yield. Our data suggest that the method and sequence of sEV enrichment strategy impacts protein ID, which may influence the outcome of biomarker discovery studies. |
