Outcomes of progressive tension donor-site closure in abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction.

Autor: Wu Young MY; Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine; Chicago, IL, USA., Holoyda KA; Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine; Chicago, IL, USA; Barton Health Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, South Lake Tahoe, CA, USA., Chang DW; Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine; Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: dchang@surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS [J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg] 2022 Sep; Vol. 75 (9), pp. 2991-2995. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 May 02.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.04.096
Abstrakt: Background: The use of progressive tension sutures (PTSs) for drain-free abdominoplasty closure has been well published in the esthetic literature and found to be effective at reducing abdominal drainage without a worse complication profile. This research aims to evaluate the outcomes of incorporating PTS into donor-site closures for abdominal-based breast reconstruction.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed evaluating patients at the University of Chicago Medicine, who underwent autologous breast reconstruction and either PTS closure or standard abdominal closure between 2018 and 2021.
Results: A total of 100 patients were included with 50 patients receiving PTS closure and 50 with traditional abdominal closures. Patient demographics, including age (p = 0.82), body mass index (BMI; p = 0.17), diabetes (p = 1.00), tobacco use (p = 0.15), and chemotherapy (p = 1.00) did not significantly differ. Total drain output over the first 72 h was significantly lower in the PTS group compared with the standard closure (SC) group (p = 0.00005). Mean duration of drain placement was shorter by 2 days in the PTS group, but this did not reach significance (p = 0.08). Overall complication rates were lower in the PTS group (p = 0.03), however, no difference was appreciated when separately assessing for seromas (p = 1.00), hematomas (p = 1.00), wound dehiscence (p = 0.58), or surgical-site infections (p = 1.00). More abdominal revisions were observed in the SC group, however, this did not reach significance (p = 0.15) CONCLUSION: The use of PTS with placement of a single drain is a safe option for donor-site closure, and is a compelling technique for patients undergoing abdominal-based breast reconstruction.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors do not have any conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2022 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: