Exploring patient experiences and acceptability of group vs. individual acupuncture for Cancer-related pain: a qualitative study.

Autor:	Oberoi D; Division of Psychosocial Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada., Reed EN; Division of Psychosocial Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada., Piedalue KA; Division of Psychosocial Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada., Landmann J; Vive Integrative Health Group, 1889 - 45 Street NW, Calgary, AB, Canada., Carlson LE; Division of Psychosocial Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. lcarlso@ucalgary.ca.; Department of Psychosocial Oncology, Cancer Control Alberta, Tom Baker Cancer Centre Holy Cross Site, 2202 2nd St. SW, Calgary, Alberta, T2S 3C1, Canada. lcarlso@ucalgary.ca.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	BMC complementary medicine and therapies [BMC Complement Med Ther] 2022 Jun 13; Vol. 22 (1), pp. 155. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jun 13.
DOI:	10.1186/s12906-022-03600-6
Abstrakt:	Background: Individual acupuncture (AP) is a safe and effective treatment for cancer-related pain and other symptoms in cancer survivors. However, access to individual AP is limited, and costs can be prohibitive. Group AP could be a more cost-effective alternative as it is less expensive and non-inferior to individual AP for pain relief. Despite growing evidence in favour of group AP, patient acceptability and experience of group AP in cancer patients is relatively unknown. This exploratory study sought to compare patient experiences and acceptability of group versus individual AP in cancer patients. Methods: Semi-structured, open-ended, in-depth interviews were conducted in a subset of 11 cancer patients enrolled in a randomized non-inferiority trial of group vs. individual AP for cancer pain. Participants for this study were recruited via purposive sampling, aiming for diversity in age, sex, education, employment, cancer types, and treatment arms. Data was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Two major themes were identified: a) overall experience of AP treatment b) value of AP. Participants across both treatment arms acknowledged improvement in pain, quality of sleep, mood and fatigue. Participants in the group AP arm reported a significant increase in perceived social support, while participants in the individual arm valued privacy and one-on-one interaction with the acupuncturist. Although some participants in the group arm had privacy-related concerns before the commencement of the program, these concerns waned after a few AP sessions. Participants across both the treatment arms reported cordial clinician-patient relationship with the acupuncturist. Willingness to pursue AP treatment in the future was comparable across both the treatment arms and was limited by out-of-pocket costs. Conclusion: Patient acceptability and experience of treatment in group AP was on par with individual AP. Group AP may further augment perceived social support among patients and privacy concerns, if any, subside after a few sessions. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03641222 ). Registered 10 July 2018 - Retrospectively registered. (© 2022. The Author(s).)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu