Fecal Microbiota Transplant in Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infections: A Systematic Review.
| Autor: | Gupta K; Research, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA., Tappiti M; Neurosciences, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA., Nazir AM; Research, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA., Koganti B; Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA., Memon MS; Research, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA., Aslam Zahid MB; Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA., Shantha Kumar V; Health Sciences, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA., Mostafa JA; Psychiatry, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Cureus [Cureus] 2022 May 05; Vol. 14 (5), pp. e24754. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 May 05 (Print Publication: 2022). |
| DOI: | 10.7759/cureus.24754 |
| Abstrakt: | Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) is the process of transferring the fecal microbiome from a healthy donor to an individual with repeated multiple episodes of Clostridium difficile infection. It is also known as stool transplant. Fecal microbiota transplant is effective and safe in various studies, the approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) remains pending. The main objective of this systemic review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stool transplant in studies with only treatment groups (FMT) and studies with treatment (FMT) and antibiotic (AB) groups and previous studies. Online databases PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and Embase were searched for relevant articles in the last five years (2016 to 2021) using automation tools. Following the removal of duplicates, screening of eligibility criteria, titles/abstracts, and quality appraisal were done by two authors independently. In total, seven observational studies are in this review article. Out of the seven observational studies, five are retrospective and two prospective. Two of the five retrospective and one of two prospective studies have a control group. In both the prospective studies and one retrospective study, FMT efficacy of (68% to 93%) was demonstrated in the elderly population despite high index comorbidities. In the younger individuals with inflammatory bowel disease, and efficacy of 90% or above was found. The most common side effects were minor such as fever, abdominal pain, bloating, and flatulence. In one study, two cases of aspiration events occurred attributed to the gastroscopy route of donor feces delivery. There was no statistical significance in the incidence of diseases such as (allergies, autoimmune diseases, cancer, inflammatory bowel diseases, and neurological diseases like dementia and migraine). Fecal microbiota transplantation has shown to be effective and safe in recurrent Clostridium difficile infections. Since very few pragmatic studies have demonstrated its efficacy and safety, their application is not well established. Robust studies, both observation and experiment, are required in the future to well-establish its effectiveness, safety in the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. (Copyright © 2022, Gupta et al.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|