Telemedicine evaluation of new head and neck patients at a tertiary academic clinic during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Autor: Xie KZ; Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA., Antezana LA; Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA., Bowen AJ; Department of Otolaryngology (ENT)/Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA., Yin LX; Department of Otolaryngology (ENT)/Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA., Yeakel S; Department of Otolaryngology (ENT)/Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA., Nassiri A; Department of Otolaryngology (ENT)/Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA., Moore EJ; Department of Otolaryngology (ENT)/Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of telemedicine and telecare [J Telemed Telecare] 2024 Jun; Vol. 30 (5), pp. 860-870. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jun 06.
DOI: 10.1177/1357633X221100054
Abstrakt: Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 accelerated the use of virtual visits within health care. We examined the utility of telemedicine for conducting visits in a tertiary head and neck practice.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients presenting via video to a tertiary-level head and neck clinic between January 2020 and December 2020. Patient demographics were collected in addition to visit indication, diagnostic imaging/tests at the time of visit, and post-visit plan. Visits were deemed successful if evaluation by video was sufficient in determining a clinical plan and did not require deferment of recommendations for subsequent in-person consult visits and/or work-up (labs, imaging). Logistic regression was performed to identify variables that served as significant predictors of successful video visits.
Results: A total of 124 video visits were reviewed. Video visits were successful for the initial evaluation 88.7% of the time ( n  = 110). Computerized tomographic scans were the most available diagnostic test, available for 54% of patients ( n  = 67), followed by biopsy report 30.6% ( n  = 38). Visit indication had a statistically significant effect on whether a treatment plan could be made ( p  = 0.024). For new patients with parotid masses ( n  = 42), definitive treatment plans could be made 97.6% of the time ( n  = 41). Patients presenting with an indication of thyroid mass (odds ratio: 0.19 (confidence interval: 0.00072-0.50), p  = 0.018) and other neck mass (odds ratio: 0.035 (confidence interval: 0.0014, 0.90), p  = 0.043) were at significantly lesser odds than parotid patients to have a successful video visit.
Discussion: In this study, virtual visits were successful for a high percentage of head and neck visits, particularly among patients seeking evaluation for parotid-related concerns.
Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Databáze: MEDLINE