How Safe is Singing Under Pandemic Conditions? - CO 2 -Measurements as Simple Method for Risk Estimation During Choir Rehearsals.

Autor: Bauer K; Institute of Mechanics and Fluid Dynamics, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg 09599, Germany. Electronic address: Katrin.Bauer@imfd.tu-freiberg.de., Hardege R; Institute of Mechanics and Fluid Dynamics, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg 09599, Germany., Neumann S; Institute of Mechanics and Fluid Dynamics, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg 09599, Germany., Schwarze R; Institute of Mechanics and Fluid Dynamics, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg 09599, Germany., Fuchs M; Division of Phoniatrics and Audiology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 10-14, Leipzig 04103, Germany; Institute for Musicians' Medicine, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 10-14, Leipzig 04103, Germany., Heinrich Pieper L; Division of Phoniatrics and Audiology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 10-14, Leipzig 04103, Germany; Institute for Musicians' Medicine, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 10-14, Leipzig 04103, Germany.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation [J Voice] 2022 Jun 03. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jun 03.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.05.003
Abstrakt: Objectives: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has forced choirs to pause or at least to restrict rehearsals and concerts. Nevertheless, an uncertainty about the risks of infection while singing remains, especially with regard to distances, duration of singing, number of singers and their positions in the room, size of the room as well as ventilation strategies. Based on the assumption that CO 2 is a suitable indicator for the exhaled aerosols in a room, it is the aim of this study to deduce recommendations for a choir rehearsal with a minimum risk of infection.
Methods: During two choir rehearsals in a typical, nonventilated classroom, we installed 30 CO 2 sensors, which allow spatial and temporal evaluation of the CO 2 dispersion during singing. Various singing and ventilation phases were applied and the rates of CO 2 increase during singing as well as its decrease during ventilation phases were evaluated and compared for different scenarios.
Results: The measurements reveal a linear relation between the duration of singing, size of the room and number of persons. For our size of the room of 200 m 3 the average CO 2 increase is 1.83 ppm/min per person. Masks or pure breathing without singing do - in contrast to aerosol dispersion - not influence the rate of CO 2 increase. CO 2 disperses fast and homogeneously on horizontal planes. However, a vertical layering with a maximum CO 2 concentration is observed near the ceiling. Shock ventilation shows the largest CO 2 decrease within the first 5 min, after 10 min of ventilation the outside base concentration of 400 ppm is reached again.
Conclusion: The evaluated relations allow to calculate safe singing times for a defined number of singers and size of the room until a critical threshold of 800 ppm is reached. Furthermore, in order to monitor the actual CO 2 concentration during choir rehearsal, just one CO 2 sensor is representative for the air quality and CO 2 concentration of the whole room and thus considered sufficient. For an early warning, it should be installed near the ceiling. Direct singing into a sensor should be avoided. A ventilation time of just 5 min is recommended which represents a compromise between strong CO 2 reduction and still sufficient room temperature during winter time.
(Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: