| Autor: |
Giechaskiel B; European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy., Jakobsson T; Scania, CV AB, 15187 Södertälje, Sweden., Karlsson HL; Scania, CV AB, 15187 Södertälje, Sweden., Khan MY; Cummins Inc., Columbus, IN 47201, USA., Kronlund L; Volvo GTT, SE-405 08 Göteborg, Sweden., Otsuki Y; Horiba Europe GmbH, 61440 Oberursel, Germany., Bredenbeck J; A&D Europe GmbH, 64295 Darmstadt, Germany., Handler-Matejka S; IAG Prüfstandstechnik GmbH, A-2722 Weikersdorf, Austria. |
| Abstrakt: |
Road transport contributes significantly to air pollution in cities. Regulations across the globe continuously reduce the limits that vehicles need to respect during their lifetimes. Furthermore, more pollutants are being subject to control with new regulations and, most important, testing tends to be done under real-world conditions on the road. In this study, various portable systems were compared with laboratory-grade equipment with a wide range of emissions, focusing on the lower end, where the measurement uncertainty of the instruments is crucial for the determination of emission limits. The engines were diesel- and compressed natural gas (CNG)-fueled. The results were promising, with relatively small differences between portable emissions measurement systems (PEMSs), portable Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and quantum cascade laser infrared (QCL-IR) spectrometers, and the respective laboratory-grade analyzers based on chemiluminescence detection (CLD), non-dispersive infrared (NDIR), and FTIR principles. The results also highlighted the need for strict technical regulations regarding accuracy and drift for low emission limits in future. |
