Poor Performance of Angiotensin II Enzyme-Linked Immuno-Sorbent Assays in Mostly Hypertensive Cohort Routinely Screened for Primary Aldosteronism.

Autor: Łebek-Szatańska A; Department of Endocrinology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Bielanski Hospital, 01-809 Warsaw, Poland., Papierska L; Department of Endocrinology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Bielanski Hospital, 01-809 Warsaw, Poland., Glinicki P; Department of Endocrinology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Bielanski Hospital, 01-809 Warsaw, Poland., Zgliczyński W; Department of Endocrinology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Bielanski Hospital, 01-809 Warsaw, Poland.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) [Diagnostics (Basel)] 2022 Apr 30; Vol. 12 (5). Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Apr 30.
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051124
Abstrakt: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common, but broadly underdiagnosed, form of hormonal hypertension. To improve screening procedures, current biochemical approaches aim to determine newly appreciated angiotensin II (Ang II) and calculate the aldosterone-to-angiotensin II ratio (AA2R). Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of these screening tests in comparison to the aldosterone-to-direct renin ratio (ADRR), which is routinely used. Cheap and available ELISA was used for Ang II measurement. To our knowledge, this is the first study of this laboratory method’s usage in PA. The study cohort included 20 PA patients and 80 controls. Ang II concentrations were comparable between PA and non-PA patients (773.5 vs. 873.2 pg/mL, p = 0.23, respectively). The AA2R was statistically significantly higher in PA group when compared with non-PA (0.024 vs. 0.012 ng/dL/pg/mL, p < 0.001). However, the diagnostic performance of the AA2R was significantly worse than that of the ADRR (AUROC 0.754 vs. 0.939, p < 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of the AA2R were 70% and 76.2%, respectively. Thus, the AA2R was not effective as a screening tool for PA. Our data provide important arguments in the discussion on the unsatisfactory accuracy of renin−angiotensin system evaluation by recently repeatedly used ELISA tests.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje