Incidence of adverse events with therapies targeting HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a literature review.
Autor: | Perez EA; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. eaperezmd@gmail.com., Dang C; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA., Lee C; Daiichi Sankyo, Basking Ridge, NJ, USA., Singh J; Daiichi Sankyo, Basking Ridge, NJ, USA., Wang K; Daiichi Sankyo, Basking Ridge, NJ, USA., Layton JB; RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA., Gilsenan A; RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA., Hackshaw MD; Daiichi Sankyo, Basking Ridge, NJ, USA., Cortes J; International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain.; Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MedSIR), Barcelona, Spain.; Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MedSIR), Ridgewood, NJ, USA.; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Breast cancer research and treatment [Breast Cancer Res Treat] 2022 Jul; Vol. 194 (1), pp. 1-11. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 May 19. |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10549-021-06469-0 |
Abstrakt: | Purpose: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies improve survival for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer but carry risks of hematologic, cardiopulmonary, gastro-hepatobiliary, and other adverse events (AEs). In this review, we describe published AE incidences for HER2-targeted therapies for metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase to identify studies on HER2-targeted therapies in HER2-positive mBC, reporting on AEs of special interest, and published between January 1, 2009, and February 6, 2020. Treatment regimens were categorized into mutually exclusive therapy-based categories, with primary therapy determined by worldwide approval date. Results: One hundred and fifty-three included articles assessed a combined 29,238 patients treated with the following therapy-based regimens: trastuzumab or biosimilars (78 studies), lapatinib (40), T-DM1 (ado-trastuzumab emtansine) (20), pertuzumab (14), neratinib (8), MM-302 (1), T-DXd (2), tucatinib (3), and pyrotinib (3). While direct comparisons of AE incidence are not warranted owing to study heterogeneity, proportions of patients experiencing any Grade 3 + AE ranged across therapy-based regimens from 39.4% (lapatinib) to 66.3% (neratinib). The most common hematologic AE of special interest, of any grade and regardless of causality, was leukopenia/white blood cells decreased [21.4% (T-DXd)-46.2% (pyrotinib)]. Cardiopulmonary AEs of special interest included interstitial lung disease [2.7% (trastuzumab)-5.2% (T-DXd)], pneumonitis [0.2% (lapatinib)-7.4% (trastuzumab)], and decreased ejection fraction [1% (T-DXd)-13.6% (trastuzumab)]. Gastro-hepatobiliary AEs of special interest included nausea [33.9% (trastuzumab)-78.3% (T-DXd)], vomiting [19.2% (T-DM1)-48.2% (T-DXd)], diarrhea [19.6% (T-DM1)-96.9% (pyrotinib)], and hepatotoxicity [5.9% (lapatinib)-53.6% (T-DM1)]. Conclusion: Differing AE profiles for anti-HER2 therapies should be considered when assessing benefit-risk profile for treatment options. (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |