Media Depiction of Birth Differences of the Upper Extremity: Accuracy of Shared Diagnoses.
| Autor: | Frantz LM; University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita, KS., Wall LB; Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO., Goldfarb CA; Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Journal of pediatric orthopedics [J Pediatr Orthop] 2022 Aug 01; Vol. 42 (7), pp. e753-e755. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 May 17. |
| DOI: | 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002185 |
| Abstrakt: | Background: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of public representation of congenital differences of the upper extremities. We hypothesized that there is an over-diagnosis of certain diagnoses such as amniotic constriction band and under-diagnosis of others such as symbrachydactyly and radial deficiency. Methods: Publicly shared images and associated diagnoses were searched on publicly available news media and social media accounts published from October 2018 through November 2021 using key terms such as "amniotic band syndrome," "congenital arm amputation," and "3D prosthetic arm" as well as The Lucky Fin Project account on Instagram. The images were collected and reviewed by 2 congenital hand surgeons. The surgeons' diagnoses were then compared to the reported diagnoses associated with each image to assess accuracy. Results: A total of 100 images were collected with the reported diagnosis associated with each image. Two images were removed due to evidence of prior surgery. The hand surgeons' diagnosis disagreed with the reported diagnosis in 60 of 98 (61%) images. Of those 60 inaccurate diagnoses, 2/3 were reported as amniotic constriction band. Conclusions: Media and social media depictions of congenital upper extremity differences are frequently inaccurate, and our search demonstrated that the amniotic constriction band is the most commonly reported, inaccurate diagnosis. Accuracy of diagnosis in public media is important given the impact a diagnosis has on those viewing and sharing the images. Level of Evidence: Level IV, diagnostic. Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|