Autor: |
Costachescu B; Department of Neurosurgery, 'Gr. T. Popa' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.; Department of Neurosurgery, 'Prof. Dr. N. Oblu' Clinical Emergency Hospital, 700309 Iasi, Romania., Popescu CE; Department of Neurosurgery, 'Prof. Dr. N. Oblu' Clinical Emergency Hospital, 700309 Iasi, Romania., Iliescu BF; Department of Neurosurgery, 'Gr. T. Popa' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.; Department of Neurosurgery, 'Prof. Dr. N. Oblu' Clinical Emergency Hospital, 700309 Iasi, Romania. |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Zdroj: |
Journal of clinical medicine [J Clin Med] 2022 Apr 29; Vol. 11 (9). Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Apr 29. |
DOI: |
10.3390/jcm11092498 |
Abstrakt: |
Although they represent a significant chapter of traumatic pathology with a deep medical and social impact, thoracolumbar fractures have proven to be elusive in terms of a definitive classification. The ever-changing concept of the stability of a thoracolumbar injury (from Holdsworth's two-column concept to Denis' three-column theory), the meaningful integration of neurological deficit, and a reliable clinical usability have made reaching a universally accepted and reproductible classification almost impossible. The advent of sophisticated imaging techniques and an improved understanding of spine biomechanics led to the development of several classification systems. Each successive system has contributed significantly to the understanding of physiopathological mechanisms and better treatment management. Magerl et al. developed a comprehensive classification system based on progressive morphological damage determined by the following three fundamental forces: compression, distraction, and axial torque. Vaccaro et al. devised the thoracolumbar injury severity score based on the following three independent variables: the morphology of the injury, posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) integrity, and neurological status at the time of injury. However, there are limitations to the classification system, especially when magnetic resonance imaging yields an uncertain status of PLC. The authors review the various classification systems insisting on their practical relevance and caveats and illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of the most widely used systems with relevant cases from their practice. |
Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |
|
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje |
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
|