| Autor: |
Guaracha-Basáñez GA; Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition 'Salvador-Zubirán', Mexico City, Mexico., Contreras-Yáñez I; Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition 'Salvador-Zubirán', Mexico City, Mexico., Estrada-González VA; Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition 'Salvador-Zubirán', Mexico City, Mexico., Estrada-González VA; Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition 'Salvador-Zubirán', Mexico City, Mexico., Valverde-Hernández SS; Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition 'Salvador-Zubirán', Mexico City, Mexico., Hernández-Molina G; Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition 'Salvador-Zubirán', Mexico City, Mexico., Pascual-Ramos V; Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition 'Salvador-Zubirán', Mexico City, Mexico. |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association [Telemed J E Health] 2022 Dec; Vol. 28 (12), pp. 1835-1842. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 May 03. |
| DOI: |
10.1089/tmj.2022.0078 |
| Abstrakt: |
Introduction: The objectives of this study were to compare the quality-of-care and compliance with medical record regulations between in-person consultations (QIP and CIP) and telephone consultations (QTP and CTP), from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) outpatients, during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to explore the impact of the consultation modality on the treatment. Methods: Data from 324 medical notes corresponding to rheumatic consultations between July and December 2020 were abstracted. Notes were selected considering a stratified (in-person and telephone consultations) random sampling strategy. QIP, CIP, QTP, and CTP were scored based on prespecified criteria as percentages, where higher numbers translated into better standards. Logistic regression analysis investigated the association between the consultation modality and the treatment recommendation (dependent variable). Results: There were 208 (64.2%) medical notes related to in-person consultations and 114 (35.2%) to telephone consultations. Overall, medical notes corresponded to middle-aged women with long-standing disease. QIP was superior to QTP (median, interquartile range): 60% (60-75%) versus 50% (25-60%), p ≤ 0.001, and differences were related to disease activity and prognosis documentation (81.3% vs. 34.5% and 55.8% vs. 33.6%, respectively, p ≤ 0.001) and the prolonged prescription of glucocorticoids with a documented management plan (58.5% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.045). Meanwhile, CIP and CTP were similar. Telephone consultation was a significant risk factor for no changes in the treatment recommendation (odds ratio: 2.113, 95% confidence interval: 1.284-3.479, p = 0.003), and results were consistent in the 142 medical notes with documented absence of disease activity. Conclusions: In the clinical context of RA, the quality-of-care provided by telephone consultations is below the standard of care and impacts the treatment. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
