[Systematic reviews in five steps: II. Identifying relevant literature].

Autor:	Khan KS; Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Universidad de Granada, Granada, España; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP-Spain)., Bueno-Cavanillas A; Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Universidad de Granada, Granada, España; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP-Spain). Electronic address: abueno@ugr.es., Zamora J; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP-Spain); Unidad de Bioestadística Clínica, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, España; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
Jazyk:	Spanish; Castilian
Zdroj:	Semergen [Semergen] 2022 Sep; Vol. 48 (6), pp. 431-436. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 May 03.
DOI:	10.1016/j.semerg.2021.12.006
Abstrakt:	This article focuses on the second step of a systematic review, i.e. how to identify relevant studies for the planned review. The search, using terms related to the questions framed in the previous step, should be comprehensive. However, it is important to establish selection criteria to include relevant studies and to exclude those that might present a risk of bias at this stage. Details such as broadening the spectrum of electronic databases consulted, avoiding restricting searches to a single language, managing references correctly, and recording decisions made throughout the process are winning factors for successful study identification. (Copyright © 2022 Sociedad Española de Médicos de Atención Primaria (SEMERGEN). Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu