Predictive Processing in Sign Languages: A Systematic Review.
| Autor: | Radošević T; Laboratory for Sign Language and Deaf Culture Research, Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia., Malaia EA; Laboratory for Neuroscience of Dynamic Cognition, Department of Communicative Disorders, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, United States., Milković M; Laboratory for Sign Language and Deaf Culture Research, Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Frontiers in psychology [Front Psychol] 2022 Apr 14; Vol. 13, pp. 805792. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Apr 14 (Print Publication: 2022). |
| DOI: | 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.805792 |
| Abstrakt: | The objective of this article was to review existing research to assess the evidence for predictive processing (PP) in sign language, the conditions under which it occurs, and the effects of language mastery (sign language as a first language, sign language as a second language, bimodal bilingualism) on the neural bases of PP. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework. We searched peer-reviewed electronic databases (SCOPUS, Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and EBSCO host) and gray literature (dissertations in ProQuest). We also searched the reference lists of records selected for the review and forward citations to identify all relevant publications. We searched for records based on five criteria (original work, peer-reviewed, published in English, research topic related to PP or neural entrainment, and human sign language processing). To reduce the risk of bias, the remaining two authors with expertise in sign language processing and a variety of research methods reviewed the results. Disagreements were resolved through extensive discussion. In the final review, 7 records were included, of which 5 were published articles and 2 were dissertations. The reviewed records provide evidence for PP in signing populations, although the underlying mechanism in the visual modality is not clear. The reviewed studies addressed the motor simulation proposals, neural basis of PP, as well as the development of PP. All studies used dynamic sign stimuli. Most of the studies focused on semantic prediction. The question of the mechanism for the interaction between one's sign language competence (L1 vs. L2 vs. bimodal bilingual) and PP in the manual-visual modality remains unclear, primarily due to the scarcity of participants with varying degrees of language dominance. There is a paucity of evidence for PP in sign languages, especially for frequency-based, phonetic (articulatory), and syntactic prediction. However, studies published to date indicate that Deaf native/native-like L1 signers predict linguistic information during sign language processing, suggesting that PP is an amodal property of language processing. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021238911], identifier [CRD42021238911]. Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. (Copyright © 2022 Radošević, Malaia and Milković.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|