| Autor: |
Capitain CC; Institute for Instrumental Analytics and Bioanalytics, Mannheim University of Applied Sciences, 68163 Mannheim, Germany., Nejati F; Bioprocess Engineering, Institute of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Ackerstrasse 76 ACK 24, 13355 Berlin, Germany., Zischka M; Institute for Instrumental Analytics and Bioanalytics, Mannheim University of Applied Sciences, 68163 Mannheim, Germany., Berzak M; Institute for Instrumental Analytics and Bioanalytics, Mannheim University of Applied Sciences, 68163 Mannheim, Germany., Junne S; Bioprocess Engineering, Institute of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Ackerstrasse 76 ACK 24, 13355 Berlin, Germany., Neubauer P; Bioprocess Engineering, Institute of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Ackerstrasse 76 ACK 24, 13355 Berlin, Germany., Weller P; Institute for Instrumental Analytics and Bioanalytics, Mannheim University of Applied Sciences, 68163 Mannheim, Germany. |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Metabolites [Metabolites] 2022 Mar 28; Vol. 12 (4). Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 28. |
| DOI: |
10.3390/metabo12040299 |
| Abstrakt: |
Fermented foods, such as yogurt and kefir, contain a versatile spectrum of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including ethanol, acetic acid, ethyl acetate, and diacetyl. To overcome the challenge of overlapping peaks regarding these key compounds, the drift tube temperature was raised in a prototypic high-temperature ion mobility spectrometer (HTIMS). This HS-GC-HTIMS was used for the volatilomic profiling of 33 traditional kefir, 13 commercial kefir, and 15 commercial yogurt samples. Pattern recognition techniques, including principal component analysis (PCA) and NNMF, in combination with non-targeted screening, revealed distinct differences between traditional and commercial kefir while showing strong similarities between commercial kefir and yogurt. Classification of fermented dairy samples into commercial yogurt, commercial kefir, traditional mild kefir, and traditional tangy kefir was also possible for both PCA- and NNMF-based models, obtaining cross-validation (CV) error rates of 0% for PCA-LDA, PCA- k NN ( k = 5), and NNMF- k NN ( k = 5) and 3.3% for PCA-SVM and NNMF-LDA. Through back projection of NNMF loadings, characteristic substances were identified, indicating a mild flavor composition of commercial samples, with high concentrations of buttery-flavored diacetyl. In contrast, traditional kefir showed a diverse VOC profile with high amounts of flavorful alcohols (including ethanol and methyl-1-butanol), esters (including ethyl acetate and 3-methylbutyl acetate), and aldehydes. For validation of the results and deeper understanding, qPCR sequencing was used to evaluate the microbial consortia, confirming the microbial associations between commercial kefir and commercial yogurt and reinforcing the differences between traditional and commercial kefir. The diverse flavor profile of traditional kefir primarily results from the yeast consortium, while commercial kefir and yogurt is primarily, but not exclusively, produced through bacterial fermentation. The flavor profile of fermented dairy products may be used to directly evaluate the microbial consortium using HS-GC-HTIMS analysis. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
