Rescue Stenting for Refractory Large Vessel Occlusions in the Thrombectomy Era: Intracranial Use of Coronary Stents in Low-mid Economic Settings.
| Autor: | Sajja KC; Endovascular Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove, USA., Huded V; Neuroscience, Narayana Health City Hospital, Bangalore, IND., Prajapati C; Neurology, Narayana Health City Hospital, Bangalore, IND., Male S; Neurology, Vidant Medical Center, Greenville, USA., Sharma MK; Neurology, Apollo Hospitals, Ahmedabad, IND., Shah S; Neurology, Arihant Neurocenter, Nasik, IND., Bohra V; Neurology, Rukmani Birla Hospital, Jaipur, IND., Chakravarthi S; Neurology, Latha Institute of Neurosciences, Vijayawada, IND., Prasanna LS; Neurology, Apollo Hospitals, Hyderabad, IND., Sura PR; Neurology, Life Neuro Vascular Institute, Guntur, IND., Paramasivam S; Neurosurgery, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, IND., Gorijala VK; Neurology, Guntur Medical College, Guntur, IND., Guntamukkala A; Neurology, Life Neuro Vascular Institute, Guntur, IND., Somasundaram K; Neurology, Ramesh Hospitals, Guntur, IND., Vemuri RT; Neurology, Life Neuro Vascular Institute, Guntur, IND. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Cureus [Cureus] 2022 Apr 05; Vol. 14 (4), pp. e23847. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Apr 05 (Print Publication: 2022). |
| DOI: | 10.7759/cureus.23847 |
| Abstrakt: | Background: Failed mechanical thrombectomy due to a refractory emergent large vessel occlusion (RELVO) in patients presenting with an acute stroke poses a major challenge to the outcomes. Objective: We demonstrate the use of coronary stents in the intracranial circulation as rescue stenting for an already expensive mechanical thrombectomy procedure in a mid-low socioeconomic setting. Methods: A retrospective, multicenter study was conducted between December 2015 and January 2021. The studied cohort were patients who required the use of a rescue stenting using a coronary stent for emergent large vessel occlusion to avoid failed recanalization. Failed recanalization was defined as failed vessel recanalization after at least two passes. Patient demographic data, procedure specifics, type of stent used, and procedural outcomes were collected. Results: A total of 26 patients with acute ischemic stroke were included from eight different centers across India. Out of 26 patients, 19 (73.0%) were male and seven were female (26.9%). The mean age was 53.6 years, the youngest patient was 23 years old and the eldest was 68 years old. Seven patients (26.9%) had posterior circulation stroke due to occlusion of the vertebral or basilar artery and 19 patients (73.0%) had anterior circulation stroke median NIHSS at presentation was 16 (range 10 to 28) in anterior circulation stroke and 24 (range 16 to 30) in posterior circulation stroke. Intravenous thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) was given in three patients (11.5%). The hospital course of two patients was complicated by symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), which was fatal. Favorable revascularization outcome and favorable functional outcome was achieved in 22 patients (84.6%), three patients passed away (11.5%), and one patient was lost to follow up. Conclusions: Overall, our study finds that rescue stenting using coronary stents can potentially improve outcomes in refractory large vessel occlusions while minimizing costs in low-mid economic settings. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. (Copyright © 2022, Sajja et al.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|