Perception of journal club seminars by medical doctoral students: results from five years of evaluation.

Autor: Taverna M; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Munich, Germany., Bucher JN; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Munich, Germany., Weniger M; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Munich, Germany., Gropp R; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Munich, Germany., Lee SML; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Munich, Germany., Mayer B; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Munich, Germany., Werner J; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Munich, Germany., Bazhin AV; Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Munich, Germany.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: GMS journal for medical education [GMS J Med Educ] 2022 Feb 15; Vol. 39 (1), pp. Doc4. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Feb 15 (Print Publication: 2022).
DOI: 10.3205/zma001525
Abstrakt: Objectives: A journal club is one of the well-established and popular methods of post-graduate education. In this work, we were interested to understand how the participants perceive journal club as a whole and how they evaluate their personal process of acquiring new scientific knowledge and development of soft-skills as an indispensable prerequisite of the lifelong learning. Project description: This study is a survey analysis examining perception of journal club sessions by post-graduate medical students. A checklist for journal club preparation as well as a questionnaire for evaluation of the journal club session by participants has been developed to determine if the journal club had met its aims. Data were collected by summing up all answers to each question of the questionnaire for each session. Qualitative data from a five-year evaluation period were compiled and analyzed. Results: The journal club checklist served as a guideline for the preparation of a journal club session as well as an evaluation questionnaire containing 24 items. Our work presents evidence that journal club seminars are well perceived by participants. Furthermore, a high percentage of participants deemed the working atmosphere to be constructive and found it worthwhile to participate in the sessions. The topics of the presentations have been positively evaluated, however only a minority of participants found that the topics of the journal club was related to their own specific research topic. Concerning the distribution of the journal article, we could show that distributing the paper one week before the journal club event provided sufficient time for preparation. Our evaluation revealed that two-thirds of the participants found discussions during journal club sessions rich and productive. The motivation to think more critically increased during journal club sessions. From our work, it is evident that the participants perceived the speakers´ soft-skills to have improved with the practice. Finally, we show a clear trend of improved perception of the value of journal club sessions from beginning to the end of the evaluation time. Conclusion: Based on the analyzed evaluations, we can conclude that journal club events are highly valued by participants and could be a good option for the development of certain soft-skills.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
(Copyright © 2022 Taverna et al.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: