| Autor: |
Edwards JD; Section of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, 21611Columbia University Vagelos College of Physician and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA., Williams EP; Cohen Children's Medical Center, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.; 21611Columbia University Vagelos College of Physician and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA., Wagman EK; Emory College of Arts and Sciences, 1371Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA., McHale BL; 25065NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, New York, USA., Malone CT; 25065NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, New York, USA., Kernie SG; 25065NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, New York, USA. |
| Abstrakt: |
Background: For long-stay patients (LSP) in pediatric intensive care units (PICU), frequently rotating providers can lead to ineffective information sharing and retention, varying goals and timelines, and delayed decisions, likely contributing to prolonged admissions. Primary intensivists (one physician serves as a consistent resource for the patient/family and PICU providers) and primary nurses (a small team of PICU nurses provide consistent bedside care) seek to augment usual transitory PICU care, by enhancing continuity and, potentially, decreasing length of stay (LOS). Methods: A single-centered, partially blinded randomized controlled trial of primary intensivists and nurses versus usual care. PICU patients admitted for or expected to be admitted for >10 days and who had ≥1 complex chronic condition were eligible. A block randomization with 1:1 allocation was used. The primary outcome was PICU LOS. Multiple secondary outcomes were explored. Results: Two hundred LSPs were randomized-half to receive primaries and half to usual care. The two groups were not significantly different in their baseline and admission characteristics. LSPs randomized to receive primaries had a shorter, but non-significant, mean LOS than those randomized to usual care (32.5 vs. 37.1 days, respectively, p = .19). Compared to LSPs in the usual care group, LSPs in the primary group had fewer unplanned intubations. Among LSPs that died, DNR orders were more prevalent in the primary group. Other secondary outcome and balance metrics were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: Primary intensivists and nurses may be an effective strategy to counteract transitory PICU care and serve the distinctive needs of LSPs. However, additional studies are needed to determine the ways and to what extent they may accomplish this. |
