Reference values for bone density and bone mineral content from 5 to 80 years old in a province of Chile.

Autor: Cossio-Bolanos M; Departamento de Ciencias de la Actividad Física, Universidad Católica del Maule, Maule, Talca, Chile., Vidal-Espinoza R; Universidad Católica Silva Henriquez, Santiago, Chile., Fuentes-Lopez J; Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación (IICE), Escuela Profesional de Educación Física, Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno, Puno, Perú., Castelli Correia de Campos LF; Universidad del Bio Bio, Chillán, Chile., Andruske CL; Centro de Investigación CINEMAROS- SAC, Arequipa, Peru., Urra-Albornoz C; Escuela de Ciencias del Deporte y Actividad Física, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Santo Tomás, Talca, Chile., Alvear Vasquez F; Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, España., Gomez-Campos R; Departamento de Diversidad e Inclusividad Educativa, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: PeerJ [PeerJ] 2022 Mar 23; Vol. 10, pp. e13092. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 23 (Print Publication: 2022).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13092
Abstrakt: Background: The assessment of bone health throughout the life cycle is essential to determine fracture risk. The objectives of the work were (a) compare bone mineral density and content with international references from the United States, (b) determine maximum bone mass, (c) propose references for bone health measurements from ages 5 to 80 years old.
Methods: Research was carried out on 5,416 subjects. Weight and height were measured. Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated. The total body was scanned using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Information was extracted from the bone health measures (bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC)) for both sexes, according to pediatric and adult software.
Results and Discussion: Differences were identified between the mean values of Chilean and American men for BMD (~0.03 to 0.11 g/cm 2 ) and BMC (~0.15 to 0.46 g). Chilean females showed average values for BMD similar to the US references (~-0.01 to 0.02 g/cm 2 ). At the same time, they were relatively higher for BMC (~0.07 to 0.33 g). The cubic polynomial regression model reflected a relationship between BMD and BMC with chronological age in both sexes. For males, R 2 was higher (R 2 = 0.72 and 0.75) than for females (R 2 = 0.59 and 0.66). The estimate of maximum bone mass (MBM) for males emerged at 30 years old (1.45 ± 0.18 g/cm 2 of BMD and 3.57 ± 0.60 g of BMC) and for females at age 28 (1.22 ± 0.13 g/cm 2 of BMD and 2.57 ± 0.44 g of BMC). The LMS technique was used to generate smoothed percentiles for BMD and BMC by age and sex. Results showed that maximum bone mass occurred in females at age 28 and in males at 30. Reference values obtained from this research may be used to evaluate bone health, diagnose bone fragility and osteoporosis in individuals and regional population groups.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
(© 2022 Cossio-Bolanos et al.)
Databáze: MEDLINE