Influence of combat boot types on in-shoe forces and perceived comfort during unloaded and loaded walking.

Autor: Yeo EXS; Physical Education and Sports Science Academic Group, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore., Chhabra K; School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore., Kong PW; Physical Education and Sports Science Academic Group, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore puiwah.kong@nie.edu.sg.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: BMJ military health [BMJ Mil Health] 2024 Jan 25; Vol. 170 (1), pp. 37-42. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 25.
DOI: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2021-002061
Abstrakt: Introduction: Combat boots are essential protective gear for military personnel. The purposes of the present study were to examine (1) the influence of combat boot type on ground reaction force (GRF) variables and perceived comfort during unloaded and loaded walking and (2) the relationship between comfort and biomechanical measurements.
Methods: Four types of combat boots with different physical features (eg, mass, thickness) and mechanical properties (eg, cushioning, rigidity) were compared across 61 male participants with experience in military marching while carrying heavy loads. In each boot type, participants completed a 10-m walk under an unloaded and a 20-kg loaded conditions at their preferred speeds. Peak force and loading rate during walking were measured using the loadsol wireless in-shoe sensor system. Comfort level was assessed using a 7-point Likert scale. Difference between loaded and unloaded walking, and across boot types were statistically compared. Correlation analyses were performed between comfort and GRF variables.
Results: On average across all boot types, participants walked 2.1% slower when carrying 20-kg loads while experiencing 24.3% higher peak force and 20.8% higher loading rate. Boot D was perceived as most comfortable, followed by boots C, B and A (χ 2 (2)=115.4, p<0.001). Participants walked slightly faster (p=0.022, η p 2 = 0.052) and displayed higher loading rates (p<0.001, η p 2 =0.194) in the two more comfortable boots (C and D) than the less comfortable boots (A and B). No significant correlations were found between perceived comfort and any GRF variables.
Conclusions: Combat boot features can influence perceived comfort ratings substantially during walking, whereas biomechanical differences among boot types are more subtle regardless of load conditions. The lack of relationship between comfort and force variables suggests that both subjective and objective measurements should be considered for comprehensive evaluation of combat boots.
Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.
(© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: