Diagnostic accuracy of mercurial versus digital blood pressure measurement devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Autor: Muniyandi M; Department of Health Economics, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, No. 1, Sathyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai, 600031, India. muniyandi.m@nirt.res.in., Sellappan S; ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Port Blair, Andaman and the Nicobar Islands, India., Chellaswamy V; Department of Health Economics, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, No. 1, Sathyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai, 600031, India., Ravi K; Department of Health Economics, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, No. 1, Sathyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai, 600031, India., Karthikeyan S; Department of Health Economics, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, No. 1, Sathyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai, 600031, India., Thiruvengadam K; Department of Health Economics, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, No. 1, Sathyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai, 600031, India., Selvam JM; Department of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai, India., Karikalan N; Department of Health Economics, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, No. 1, Sathyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai, 600031, India.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2022 Mar 01; Vol. 12 (1), pp. 3363. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 01.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07315-z
Abstrakt: This study aims to systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of a digital blood pressure measurement device compared to the gold standard mercury sphygmomanometer in published studies. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, EBSCO, EMBASE and Google Scholar host databases using the specific search strategy and filters from 1st January 2000 to 3rd April 2021. We included studies reporting data on the sensitivity or specificity of blood pressure measured by digital devices and mercury sphygmomanometer used as the reference standard. Studies conducted among children, special populations, and specific disease groups were excluded. We considered published manuscripts in the English language only. The risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed based on the author's judgment using the QUADAS2 manual measurement evaluation tool. Based on the screening, four studies were included in the final analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and 95% confidence interval were estimated. The digital blood pressure monitoring has a moderate level of accuracy and the device can correctly distinguish hypertension with a pooled estimate sensitivity of 65.7% and specificity of 95.9%. After removing one study, which had very low sensitivity and very high specificity, the pooled sensitivity estimate was 79%, and the specificity was 91%. The meta-analysis of DOR suggests that the digital blood pressure monitor had moderate accuracy with a mercury sphygmomanometer. This will provide the clinician and patients with accurate information on blood pressure with which diagnostic and treatment decisions could be made.
(© 2022. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje