| Autor: |
Ghaith S; Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA., Voleti SS; Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA., Ginsberg Z; Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA., Marks LA; Division of Education, Department of Library Services, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA., Files JA; Division of Women's Health Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA., Kling JM; Division of Women's Health Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. |
| Abstrakt: |
Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects many, and health care has the potential to provide a safe space for individuals experiencing IPV. However, physicians cite lack of time and education as barriers. The aim of this study is to complete a review of published IPV curricula in medical school, residency training, and postresidency training. We performed a scoping review to provide a quantitative assessment and summary review of existing IPV curricula. In May 2020, a librarian conducted a search of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and Scopus. We evaluated each article for the following curriculum content and structure items: (1) year introduced; (2) delivery method; (3) curriculum type; (4) curriculum content; (5) curriculum effectiveness; and (6) implementation barriers. Fifty-six articles met criteria, most were for medical school learners ( n = 32, 57.1%) and short-term (lasting less than one academic year) ( n = 41, 73.2%). For residency, IPV curricula were most frequently taught in family medicine, internal medicine, and emergency medicine. Formal lecture and use of standardized patients were the most popular delivery methods. Most curricula taught risk factors for and identification of individuals who have experienced IPV. The most cited implementation barrier was limited time in standard medical education, followed by inability to measure the effectiveness of the curriculum. There was great variation in the methods of assessing effectiveness of IPV curricula. Published IPV curricula are varied, without consistent validated tools for assessing efficacy. Future initiatives to establish a standard of competency for medical students regarding IPV, including a standard curriculum, may better ensure that physicians are capable of identifying and caring for individuals who have experienced IPV. |
