Effects of low-volume, high-intensity interval training on maximal oxygen consumption, body fat percentage and health-related quality of life in women with overweight: A randomized controlled trial.

Autor: Arboleda-Serna VH; Research Group on Physical Activity for Health (AFIS, in Spanish), University Institute of Physical Education and Sports, The University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia., Patiño-Villada FA; Research Group on Physical Activity for Health (AFIS, in Spanish), University Institute of Physical Education and Sports, The University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia., Pinzón-Castro DA; Research Group on Physical Activity for Health (AFIS, in Spanish), University Institute of Physical Education and Sports, The University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia., Arango-Vélez EF; Research Group on Physical Activity for Health (AFIS, in Spanish), University Institute of Physical Education and Sports, The University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of exercise science and fitness [J Exerc Sci Fit] 2022 Apr; Vol. 20 (2), pp. 108-112. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Feb 04.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesf.2022.01.004
Abstrakt: Background: Several investigations suggest that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) provokes larger changes in VO 2max compared to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT); other studies associate HIIT with significant decreases in total, abdominal and visceral fat mass. However, some meta-analyses express that the enhancements with HIIT on VO 2max are slightly higher concerning MICT. These studies had low-to-moderate methodological quality, and the exercise protocols were completed mostly on treadmills or cycle ergometers. Thus, the objective of this study was to compare the effect of a low-volume HIIT versus a MICT program on VO 2max , body fat percentage (BFP), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in overweight women. It followed a research protocol with high methodological rigor and good reporting quality.
Methods: After two physical adaptation weeks (run-in period), thirty-five volunteers were randomized to HIIT (n = 16) or MICT (n = 19). Both groups performed 24 sessions on a grass sports field (walking, jogging or running). The HIIT group completed 15 bouts of 30 s [90-95%, maximal heart rate (HR max )], while the MICT group completed 30 min of continuous exercise (65-75% HR max ).
Results: The difference between HIIT and MICT post-intervention on VO 2max was not statistically significant (0.8 ml/kg/min. CI 95%, -1.0 to 2.7, p = 0.37). Similarly, no statistically significant differences were found between groups for BFP and HRQoL.
Conclusions: Low-volume HIIT program has no quantitative advantage compared with that resulting from MICT, in VO2max, BFP, and HRQoL. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03300895.
Competing Interests: None.
(© 2022 The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness. Published by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd.)
Databáze: MEDLINE