Bifascicular block in unexplained syncope is underrecognized and under-evaluated: A single-center audit of ESC guidelines adherence.

Autor: Shabbir MA; Department of Internal Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States of America., Saad Shaukat MH; Department of Internal Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States of America., Ehtesham M; Department of Internal Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States of America., Murawski S; Department of Internal Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States of America., Singh S; Department of Internal Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States of America., Alimohammad R; Department of Cardiology, Capital Cardiology Associates, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States of America.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: PloS one [PLoS One] 2022 Feb 28; Vol. 17 (2), pp. e0263727. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Feb 28 (Print Publication: 2022).
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263727
Abstrakt: Background: The presence of bifascicular block on electrocardiography suggests that otherwise-unexplained syncope may be due to complete heart block. European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommends investigating it with electrophysiology study (EPS). PPM is indicated if high-degree atrioventricular block is inducible. Long term rhythm monitoring with implantable loop recorder (ILR) is recommended if EPS is negative. We evaluated adherence to these guidelines.
Methods: This is a single-center retrospective audit of adult patients with bifascicular block hospitalized for unexplained syncope between January 2018 and August 2019 under general medicine service. Patients with an alternative explanation for syncope were excluded. Guideline adherence was assessed by formal cardiology consult and whether EPS followed by ILR and/or PPM were offered.
Results: 65 out of 580 adult patients (11.2%) admitted to general medicine service for syncope had a bifascicular block; 29 (5%) were identified to have bifascicular block and unexplained syncope. Median age was 77 ±10 years; 9 (31%) were female, and 6 (20.7%) patients had at least one prior hospital visit for syncope at our academic medical center. Cardiology was consulted on 17 (58.6%) patients. Two patients were evaluated by EPS (1 refused) followed by ILR. Overall, 3 out of 29 patients (10.3%) received guideline-directed evaluation during the hospitalization based on ESC guidelines. None of the patients received empiric PPM during the index hospitalization.
Conclusion: Among patients admitted to the general medicine service with unexplained syncope and bifascicular block, a minority (10.3%) underwent guideline-directed evaluation per ESC recommendations. Cardiology was consulted in 58.6% of cases.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje