Concurrent use of two independent methods prevents erroneous HLA typing of deceased organ donors - An important strategy for patient safety and accurate virtual crossmatching for broader sharing.

Autor: Cruz TD; Immunogenetics and Transplantation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States., Dames C; Immunogenetics and Transplantation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States., Pagaduan L; Immunogenetics and Transplantation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States., Cho Y; Immunogenetics and Transplantation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States., Kong D; Immunogenetics and Transplantation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States., Rajalingam R; Immunogenetics and Transplantation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States. Electronic address: Rajalingam.Raja@ucsf.edu.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Human immunology [Hum Immunol] 2022 May; Vol. 83 (5), pp. 458-466. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Feb 19.
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2022.02.004
Abstrakt: Comprehensive and accurate human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing within a short turnaround time is a crucial initial step for allocating deceased donor organs for transplantation. Erroneous HLA typing of deceased donors can be catastrophic and result in recipient death, failed transplant, and organ wastage due to inappropriately matched donors. The real-time polymerase chain reaction method is widely used as the sole method for HLA typing of deceased donors because of its simplified workflow. Herein, we have reported cases of four deceased donors showing discrepant HLA typing discovered using two independent methods concurrently. The HLA typing of these donors could have been erroneously reported if a single method had been used, which would have profound patient safety implications. In one case, the drop out of HLA-DR7 using a single method could have resulted in harmful organ allocation if the organ was transplanted after a virtual crossmatch to a sensitized candidate showing strong donor-specific HLA-DR7 antibodies. In conclusion, this case series suggests that concurrent dual typing is essential for accurate HLA typing of deceased donors. This strategy is vital because precise HLA typing is critical for accurate virtual crossmatching, which facilitates continuous distribution and broader geographic sharing of the deceased donor organ.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE