| Autor: |
Wambier LM; Universidade Positivo, Department of Dentisty, Curitiba, PR, Brazil., Gonçalves ADR; Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa - UEPG, Department of Dentistry, PR, Brazil., Wambier DS; Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa - UEPG, Department of Dentistry, PR, Brazil., Reis A; Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa - UEPG, Department of Dentistry, PR, Brazil., Chibinski ACR; Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa - UEPG, Department of Dentistry, PR, Brazil. |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Brazilian oral research [Braz Oral Res] 2022 Feb 09; Vol. 36, pp. e017. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Feb 09 (Print Publication: 2022). |
| DOI: |
10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0017 |
| Abstrakt: |
Appropriate research reports are important to facilitate the evaluation of studies and the decision-making by dentists and policymakers. This meta-research study assessed the conformity of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations with the CONSORT recommendations and their risk of bias (RoB). Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, BBO, LILACS, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from April 2019 to June 2021 for RCTs that assessed the longevity of ART restorations in children. A specific tool was used to assess adherence to the CONSORT recommendations; RoB was evaluated with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Descriptive analyses included the number of studies by journal, follow-up period, country, and quality assessments. A total of 2,181 papers were retrieved and 36 of them were analyzed qualitatively. The overall CONSORT mean score (CONms) was 22.52 ± 6.17 out of 32 points. The best described items were intervention and outcomes, whereas allocation concealment was described in only 22% of the papers. Significant differences in CONms were detected in the analysis by country and publication dates. High CONms were observed in recently published papers (26.7 ± 3.1) when compared to first ART studies (18.1 ± 4.6; p < 0.001). RoB was low in four studies, unclear in 11, and high in 21. Adherence of the papers to the CONSORT recommendations was not fully achieved and most of the papers had unclear and high RoB (PROSPERO registration #CRD42020201460). |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
