Taper Material Loss in Total Hip Replacements: Is It Affected by Joint Friction?

Autor:	McCarty CP; The J. Vernon Luck, Sr., M.D. Orthopaedic Research Center, Orthopaedic Institute for Children in Alliance with UCLA, Los Angeles, California., Park SH, Ho NC, Sangiorgio SN, Ebramzadeh E
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume [J Bone Joint Surg Am] 2022 May 04; Vol. 104 (9), pp. 796-804. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Feb 15.
DOI:	10.2106/JBJS.21.00579
Abstrakt:	Background: Metal debris and corrosion products generated from the taper junctions of modular joint replacements have been recognized as contributors to failure. Therefore, understanding the factors associated with increased taper wear and corrosion is fundamental to improving implant performance. Methods: A cohort of 85 large-diameter metal-on-metal heads and cups retrieved at revision surgery, after 10 to 96 months of service, was evaluated. First, metrology was conducted to quantify head taper material loss and implant articular surface wear. Then, joint frictional moments for each retrieved head-and-cup pair were measured during 10 cycles of simulated physiological gait in a biomechanical model. Taper material loss was evaluated for correlations with frictional moments, articular wear, head diameter, head-cup clearance, and time in vivo. Results: Peak resultant frictional moments ranged from 9.1 to 26.3 Nm, averaging 17.3 ± 2.7 Nm. Fretting and corrosion damage during in vivo service resulted in material loss from the head tapers ranging between 0.04 and 25.57 mm3, compared with combined head and cup articular wear of 0.80 to 351.75 mm3 in this cohort. Taper material loss was not correlated with higher frictional moments (R = -0.20 to 0.11, p = 0.07 to 0.81). Higher frictional moments from axial rotation were correlated with higher head and cup wear (R = 0.33, p < 0.01). The correlation between taper material loss and head diameter was weak and did not reach statistical significance (R = 0.20, p = 0.07). Taper material loss was not correlated with nominal head-cup clearance (R = 0.06, p = 0.6). Finally, taper material loss increased significantly over time (R = 0.34, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Despite serious concerns regarding trunnionosis, volumes of head taper wear were generally lower than those of articular surface wear. There was no statistical correlation between taper wear and frictional moments. Therefore, the results suggest that high friction in metal-on-metal implants does not contribute to higher material loss at the head taper, despite high bending moments. Clinical Relevance: The amount of metal debris and corrosion products from taper junctions of the joint arthroplasties, widely recognized as an insidious cause of failure, was not correlated with joint frictional moments. Multiple factors affect taper wear: implant design, material, size, surface finish, and patient weight and activity level. However, in the present cohort, high friction of metal-on-metal total hip replacements likely did not contribute to increased volume of material loss at taper interfaces, despite increased moments at the locations of taper material loss. Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJS/G932). (Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu