Practical strategies to enhance resident engagement in clinical quality improvement.

Autor: Koller JP; University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine, 101 S. Fairview Rd, Columbia, Missouri, 65203, USA. kollerjp@health.missouri.edu., Cochran KA; University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Pharmacy, Kansas City, Missouri, 64108, USA., Headrick LA; University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine, 101 S. Fairview Rd, Columbia, Missouri, 65203, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: BMC medical education [BMC Med Educ] 2022 Feb 14; Vol. 22 (1), pp. 96. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Feb 14.
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03134-y
Abstrakt: Background: Engaging residents in meaningful quality improvement (QI) is difficult. Challenges include competing demands, didactics which lack connection to meaningful work, suboptimal experiential learning, unclear accountability, absence of timely and relevant data, and lack of faculty coaches and role models. Various strategies to address these challenges for engagement have been described, but not as a unified approach. This paper describes a bundle of practical strategies to address common challenges to resident engagement in QI, illustrated through the experience of one residency education program.
Methods: 62 categorical residents in the University of Missouri Internal Medicine residency participated in a longitudinal QI curriculum integrated into residency clinic assignments with dedicated QI work sessions and brief just-in-time didactics with mentorship from faculty coaches. Residents completed at least two PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycles for their projects. The experience included clear expectations and tools for accountability. Project criteria included importance to patients, residents, and the institution. Residents had access to data related to their own practice. A pre-post survey asked residents to self-assess their level of interest and engagement in QI on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 = least desired and 5 = most desired result. Data were analyzed by paired t-test.
Results: All 62 residents participated in the program as members of ten QI teams. 40/62 residents completed both pre- and post-surveys. Items related to self-assessment of QI in clinical work all changed in the desired direction: likelihood of participation (3.7 to 4.1, p = 0.03), frequency of QI use (3.3 to 3.9, p = 0.001), and opinion about using QI in clinical work (3.9 to 4.0, p = 0.21). Resident assessment of QI priority in clinical work did not change.
Conclusions: We implemented a practical strategies bundle to overcome common challenges to successfully engaging residents in clinical quality improvement. These strategies included QI work integrated into routine clinical assignments, just-in-time didactics, experiential learning with clear expectations and strategic project selection, timely and pertinent data from the residents' own practice, and real-time faculty coaching.
(© 2022. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: