Age-related changes and longitudinal stability of individual differences in ABCD Neurocognition measures.

Autor:	Anokhin AP; Washington University in St. Louis, USA. Electronic address: andrey@wustl.edu., Luciana M; University of Minnesota, USA., Banich M; University of Colorado Boulder, USA., Barch D; Washington University in St. Louis, USA., Bjork JM; Virginia Commonwealth University, USA., Gonzalez MR; University of California San Diego, USA., Gonzalez R; Florida International University, USA., Haist F; University of California San Diego, USA., Jacobus J; University of California San Diego, USA., Lisdahl K; University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA., McGlade E; The University of Utah, USA., McCandliss B; Stanford University, USA., Nagel B; Oregon Health & Science University, USA., Nixon SJ; University of Florida, USA., Tapert S; University of California San Diego, USA., Kennedy JT; Washington University in St. Louis, USA., Thompson W; University of California San Diego, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Developmental cognitive neuroscience [Dev Cogn Neurosci] 2022 Apr; Vol. 54, pp. 101078. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jan 28.
DOI:	10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101078
Abstrakt:	Temporal stability of individual differences is an important prerequisite for accurate tracking of prospective relationships between neurocognition and real-world behavioral outcomes such as substance abuse and psychopathology. Here we report age-related changes and longitudinal test-retest stability (TRS) for the Neurocognition battery of the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, which included the NIH Toolbox (TB) Cognitive Domain and additional memory and visuospatial processing tests administered at baseline (ages 9-11) and two-year follow-up. As expected, performance improved significantly with age, but the effect size varied broadly, with Pattern Comparison and the Crystallized Cognition Composite showing the largest age-related gain (Cohen's d:.99 and.97, respectively). TRS ranged from fair (Flanker test: r = 0.44) to excellent (Crystallized Cognition Composite: r = 0.82). A comparison of longitudinal changes and cross-sectional age-related differences within baseline and follow-up assessments suggested that, for some measures, longitudinal changes may be confounded by practice effects and differences in task stimuli or procedure between baseline and follow-up. In conclusion, a subset of measures showed good stability of individual differences despite significant age-related changes, warranting their use as prospective predictors. However, caution is needed in the interpretation of observed longitudinal changes as indicators of neurocognitive development. (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu