Informing the delivery of cancer survivorship care in rural primary care practice.

Autor: Klemp JR; University of Kansas Cancer Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA. jklemp@kumc.edu., Knight CJ; University of Kansas Cancer Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA., Lowry B; Department of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA., Long T; Masonic Cancer Alliance, The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA., Bush C; Ascension, Wichita, KS, USA., Alsman K; Masonic Cancer Alliance, The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA., Krebill H; Masonic Cancer Alliance, The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA., Peereboom D; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA., Overholser L; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA., Greiner KA; Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice [J Cancer Surviv] 2022 Feb; Vol. 16 (1), pp. 4-12. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Feb 02.
DOI: 10.1007/s11764-021-01134-3
Abstrakt: Purpose: The cancer survivor population is projected to increase to 22.2 million by 2030, requiring improved collaboration between oncology and primary care practices (PCP). PCPs may feel ill-equipped to provide cancer survivorship care to patients without input from cancer specialists. Compared with nonrural cancer survivors, rural cancer survivors report experiencing worse treatment-related symptoms. The goal of this study was to gain a better understanding of the perspectives of PCP teams towards survivorship care and to develop and test an interdisciplinary training program to improve cancer survivorship care in rural practice.
Methods: This study was conducted in two phases. First, focus groups were conducted with rural PCP teams to gather information regarding beliefs, practices, and barriers related to cancer survivorship care delivery. A thematic analysis was completed using an iterative process of reviewing transcripts. Results from phase 1 were used to inform the development of a pilot intervention tested within seven rural PCPs (phase 2). Pre- and post-intervention knowledge changes were compared, and post-session interviews assessed planned or sustained practice changes.
Results: Seven PCPs participated in focus groups (phase 1). Cross-cutting themes identified included (1) organizational barriers affecting the delivery of cancer survivorship care, (2) challenges of role delineation with specialists and patients, (3) difficulty accessing survivorship care and resources, and (4) providers' lack of knowledge of cancer survivorship care. For phase 2, seven practices participated in four case-based educational sessions. Within and between practice changes were identified.
Conclusion: This project explored cancer survivorship perspectives among PCP teams. Lack of familiarity with evidence-based guidelines and the inability to identify cancer survivors was apparent during discussions and led to the implementation of the phase 2 intervention, iSurvive. As a result, PCPs either changed or planned changes to improve the identification and evidence-based care of cancer survivors.
Implications for Cancer Survivors: Address barriers to access cancer survivorship care in rural primary care practices.
(© 2021. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: