Participatory research in times of COVID-19 and beyond: Adjusting your methodological toolkits.

Autor:	Sattler C; Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Working Group on Governance of Ecosystem Services, Müncheberg, Germany., Rommel J; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Department of Economics, Uppsala, Sweden., Chen C; Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Working Group on Governance of Ecosystem Services, Müncheberg, Germany., García-Llorente M; Autonomous University of Madrid (UAM), Department of Ecology, Social-Ecological Systems Laboratory, Madrid, Spain., Gutiérrez-Briceño I; Autonomous University of Madrid (UAM), Department of Ecology, Social-Ecological Systems Laboratory, Madrid, Spain., Prager K; University of Aberdeen (ABDN), School of Geosciences, Department of Geography and Environment, Aberdeen, UK., Reyes MF; Wageningen University and Research (WUR), Environmental Systems Analysis, Wageningen, the Netherlands., Schröter B; Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Working Group on Governance of Ecosystem Services, Müncheberg, Germany.; Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies (LUCSUS), Lund, Sweden., Schulze C; Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Working Group on Governance of Ecosystem Services, Müncheberg, Germany., van Bussel LGJ; Wageningen University and Research (WUR), Environmental Systems Analysis, Wageningen, the Netherlands., Loft L; Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Working Group on Governance of Ecosystem Services, Müncheberg, Germany., Matzdorf B; Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Working Group on Governance of Ecosystem Services, Müncheberg, Germany.; Leibniz University of Hannover (LUH), Institute for Environmental Planning, Hanover, Germany., Kelemen E; Environmental Social Science Research Group (ESSRG), Budapest, Hungary.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	One earth (Cambridge, Mass.) [One Earth] 2022 Jan 21; Vol. 5 (1), pp. 62-73.
DOI:	10.1016/j.oneear.2021.12.006
Abstrakt:	Solving grand environmental societal challenges calls for transdisciplinary and participatory methods in social-ecological research. These methods enable co-designing the research, co-producing the results, and co-creating the impacts together with concerned stakeholders. COVID-19 has had serious impacts on the choice of research methods, but reflections on recent experiences of "moving online" are still rare. In this perspective, we focus on the challenge of adjusting different participatory methods to online formats used in five transdisciplinary social-ecological research projects. The key added value of our research is the lessons learned from a comparison of the pros and cons of adjusting a broader set of methods to online formats. We conclude that combining the adjusted online approaches with well-established face-to-face formats into more inclusive hybrid approaches can enrich and diversify the pool of available methods for postpandemic research. Furthermore, a more diverse group of participants can be engaged in the research process. Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests. (© 2021 The Author(s).)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu