| Autor: |
Tanwani A; School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77550, USA., Safdar N; School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77550, USA., Ali A; School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77550, USA., Karimaghaei C; School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77550, USA., Schmitz-Brown M; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77550, USA., Rehmani A; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77550, USA., Gupta PK; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77550, USA. |
| Abstrakt: |
Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections are the current gold standard for treating diabetic macular edema (DME). However, injection practice patterns of retina specialists have varied markedly based on physician discretion. This retrospective study analyzes the impact of injection protocol selection on change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) in 170 eyes treated by 4 retina specialists practicing a pro re nata (PRN) strategy between 2010 and 2020. DME patients received an average of 7.25 injections every 6.24 weeks over 56.6 weeks. There were significant differences between retina specialists in mean number of injections ( p = 0.0001) and mean length of treatment ( p = 0.0007) but not in mean interval between injections. Over the treatment period, average change in BCVA was -0.053 logMAR, and average change in CMT was -51.1 µm, neither of which had significant differences between retina specialists. BCVA and CMT at initial visit were found to be significantly associated with improved BCVA and CMT over the treatment period ( p < 0.001). Number of injections administered and interval between injections were not found to be significant factors affecting change in BCVA or CMT. Despite significant differences in injection dosing regimen, retina specialists achieved similar outcomes in change in BCVA and CMT over the treatment period. |
