Does the type of sagittal split ramus osteotomy influence fixation strength? Evaluation of the mechanical behavior of two types of fixation used in three types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Autor: da Silva Oliveira S; School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto (FORP-USP), University of São Paulo, Avenida Do Café, S/NRibeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14040-904, Brazil., de Carvalho PHM; School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto (FORP-USP), University of São Paulo, Avenida Do Café, S/NRibeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14040-904, Brazil., Sverzut CE; School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto (FORP-USP), University of São Paulo, Avenida Do Café, S/NRibeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14040-904, Brazil., Trivellato AE; School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto (FORP-USP), University of São Paulo, Avenida Do Café, S/NRibeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14040-904, Brazil. eliastrivellato@forp.usp.br.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Oral and maxillofacial surgery [Oral Maxillofac Surg] 2022 Dec; Vol. 26 (4), pp. 633-639. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jan 12.
DOI: 10.1007/s10006-022-01038-1
Abstrakt: Purpose: This study compared the mechanical behavior of two fixation techniques used in three sections representing the sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) in polyurethane replicas that were divided into groups, according to type of section, and sub-groups according to type of fixation, simulating 11-mm advancement and 6º clockwise mandibular rotation.
Methods: Loads were applied in two regions, aiming at progressive application and consequent strength value, measured in kilogram-force in displacements of 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm, from the load application tip. Shapiro-Wilk test was performed, followed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA-2 way), and Bonferroni's multiple comparison.
Results: The results showed no statistically significant difference in the type of section and type of fixation used when load was applied to the inter-incisor region. However, when load was applied to the first molar region, statistically significant difference was observed in 1-mm displacement, in which section described by Epker with two modifications showed greater strength, regardless of type of fixation used (p = 0.007).
Conclusion: In the application of load in the inter-incisor region, there was no statistical difference between the type of osteotomy and the type of fixation used. When applying loads to molars, there was a difference for the type of osteotomy, where the Epker osteotomy with 2 modifications presented greater resistance, regardless of the type of fixation used.
(© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: