Meta-analysis of human prediction error for incentives, perception, cognition, and action.

Autor: Corlett PR; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. philip.corlett@yale.edu., Mollick JA; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA., Kober H; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. hedy.kober@yale.edu.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology [Neuropsychopharmacology] 2022 Jun; Vol. 47 (7), pp. 1339-1349. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jan 11.
DOI: 10.1038/s41386-021-01264-3
Abstrakt: Prediction errors (PEs) are a keystone for computational neuroscience. Their association with midbrain neural firing has been confirmed across species and has inspired the construction of artificial intelligence that can outperform humans. However, there is still much to learn. Here, we leverage the wealth of human PE data acquired in the functional neuroimaging setting in service of a deeper understanding, using an MKDA (multi-level kernel-based density) meta-analysis. Studies were identified with Google Scholar, and we included studies with healthy adult participants that reported activation coordinates corresponding to PEs published between 1999-2018. Across 264 PE studies that have focused on reward, punishment, action, cognition, and perception, consistent with domain-general theoretical models of prediction error we found midbrain PE signals during cognitive and reward learning tasks, and an insula PE signal for perceptual, social, cognitive, and reward prediction errors. There was evidence for domain-specific error signals--in the visual hierarchy during visual perception, and the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex during social inference. We assessed bias following prior neuroimaging meta-analyses and used family-wise error correction for multiple comparisons. This organization of computation by region will be invaluable in building and testing mechanistic models of cognitive function and dysfunction in machines, humans, and other animals. Limitations include small sample sizes and ROI masking in some included studies, which we addressed by weighting each study by sample size, and directly comparing whole brain vs. ROI-based results.
(© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American College of Neuropsychopharmacology.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: