Implant-supported removable partial dentures compared to conventional dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quality of life, patient satisfaction, and biomechanical complications.

Autor: Bandiaky ON; Division of Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Nantes, Nantes, France., Lokossou DL; School of Dentistry, University of El Hadji Ibrahima Niasse, Dakar, Sénégal., Soueidan A; Department of Periodontology, Rmes U1229, University of Nantes, Nantes, France., Le Bars P; Division of Fixed Prosthodontics, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France., Gueye M; Department of Odontology, Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, University of Dakar, Dakar, Senegal., Mbodj EB; Department of Odontology, Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, University of Dakar, Dakar, Senegal., Le Guéhennec L; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Clinical and experimental dental research [Clin Exp Dent Res] 2022 Feb; Vol. 8 (1), pp. 294-312. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jan 11.
DOI: 10.1002/cre2.521
Abstrakt: Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare implant-supported removable partial dentures (ISRPDs) with distal extension removable partial dentures (DERPDs) in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs: patients' quality of life and satisfaction) and to determine mechanical and biological complications associated with ISRPDs.
Material and Methods: An electronic search was performed on four databases to identify studies treating Kennedy class I or II edentulous patients and which compared ISRPDs with DERPDs in terms of PROMS and studies, which evaluated mechanical and biological complications associated ISRPDs. Two authors independently extracted data on quality of life, patient satisfaction, and biomechanical complications from these studies. The risk of bias was assessed for each study, and for PROMs, the authors performed a meta-analysis by using a random-effects model.
Results: Thirteen articles were included based on the selection criteria. The difference in mean scores for quality of life (30.5 ± 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24.9-36.1) and patient satisfaction (-20.8 ± 0.2; 95% CI, -23.7 to -17.8) between treatments with conventional and implant-supported removable dentures was statistically significant (p < .05). Implant-supported removable dentures improved patients' overall quality of life and satisfaction. Some mechanical and biological complications, such as clasp adjustment, abutment or implant loosening, marginal bone resorption, and peri-implant mucositis, were noted in ISRPDs during patient follow-up. Studies assessing PROMs were very heterogeneous (I 2  = 65%, p = .85; I 2  = 75%, p = .88).
Conclusions: ISRPDs significantly improved quality of life and patient satisfaction. Some mechanical and biological complications have been associated with ISRPDs treatment, requiring regular monitoring of patients to avoid the occurrence of these complications.
(© 2021 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: