The relationship between tomographic sagittal root position of maxillary anterior teeth and the bone housing.

Autor: Rodrigues DM; Private practice, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Petersen RL; Radiologist, Petersen Diagnostic Imaging Center, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Montez C; Student, Graduate Program, School of Dentistry, Federal Fluminense University (UFF), Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., de Moraes JR; Professor, Department of Statistics, Institute of Statistics and Mathematics, Federal Fluminense University (UFF), Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Ferreira V; Student, Post Graduate Program, School of Dentistry, Federal Fluminense University (UFF), Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Barboza EP; Professor of Periodontology, Department of Dental Clinic, School of Dentistry, Federal Fluminense University (UFF), Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Electronic address: elianeporto.uff@gmail.com.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: The Journal of prosthetic dentistry [J Prosthet Dent] 2023 Nov; Vol. 130 (5), pp. 705-714. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jan 07.
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.10.006
Abstrakt: Statement of Problem: In a prosthetically driven treatment plan, the tomographic sagittal root position in relation to the bone housing is an important factor in the decision-making process for immediate implant placement. However, other important parameters must be considered in the bone housing of each tooth, including the alveolar ridge dimensions, the buccal and the palatal bone thickness, and the root dimensions.
Purpose: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the relationship between the sagittal root position of maxillary anterior teeth and the bone housing.
Materials and Methods: A total of 420 maxillary anterior teeth were analyzed in 70 participants. The tomographic scans were classified as sagittal root position classes I, II, III, and IV. Measurements included buccal and palatal bone thickness, alveolar ridge height, alveolar ridge width, apical bone height, root length, and root width. The Pearson correlation, ANOVA, and Tukey post hoc tests were used to determine statistically significant differences (α=0.05).
Results: The sagittal root position distribution was 65.2%, 9.3%, 0.7%, and 24.8% for classes I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Bone housing measurements were significantly different in relation to the 4 sagittal root position classes (P<.05), except for alveolar ridge height. Post hoc analysis showed that, in class I, buccal bone thickness and alveolar bone height were significantly low, whereas root length and palatal bone thickness were high. The higher buccal bone thickness was found in class II, and lower alveolar ridge width and palatal bone thickness in class IV. These measurements in tooth groups were also significantly different over the sagittal root position classes (P<.05). The buccal bone thickness, palatal bone thickness, and alveolar ridge width presented different levels of correlation with alveolar ridge width over the sagittal root position classes. The buccal bone thickness and palatal bone thickness were weakly correlated in class I (r=0.163) and IV (r=0.222).
Conclusions: Bone housing measurements were significantly different in relation to the sagittal root position of maxillary anterior teeth.
(Copyright © 2021 Editorial Council for The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: