Development and implementation of a medication reconciliation during pediatric transitions of care in a public hospital.

Autor:	Alcântara TDS, Lima HF, Valença-Feitosa F, Aires-Moreno GT, Santos GAD Jr, Araujo DC, Cavalcante-Santos LM, Cunha LC, Lyra DP Jr
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA [J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)] 2022 Jul-Aug; Vol. 62 (4), pp. 1400-1406.e3. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Dec 20.
DOI:	10.1016/j.japh.2021.12.009
Abstrakt:	Objectives: To generate effective changes in the work processes of an institution, such as hospitals, strategies are needed for the implementation of services. These should be based on the needs of the practice scenario and evidence that may develop programs applied to the routine of health care. This study aimed to implement medication reconciliation (MR) at the transition of care in the pediatric department of a public hospital located in Northeast Brazil. Setting: A step-by-step approach was adopted to implement MR in the studied hospital and conducted from March 2019 to December 2019. Practice Innovation: The implementation of MR used the "Model for Improvement" framework. The processes were built and tested in the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Children admitted to the hospital's pediatrics department were included in the study. The objective of the PDSA cycles was to reach 75% of the patients included, with the service performed in at least one transition of care episode. Evaluation: This study used the following indicators: number of steps performed, number of discrepancies identified, and resolution of discrepancies. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed for all variables. Results: In the first cycle, all patients (n = 34) had the best possible medication history (BPMH) completed, and 26.4% went through all the MR stages. Seventy-two discrepancies were identified and 90.3% of them were resolved. In the second cycle, all patients (n = 35) had the BPMH completed, and 20% went through all the stages. A total of 32 discrepancies were identified and 96.8% of them were resolved. In the third cycle, all patients (n = 30) had the BPMH completed, and 56.6% of patients went through all the stages. Twenty-four discrepancies were identified and resolved. Conclusion: The use of the "Model for Improvement" framework effectively contributed to the implementation of the service according to the characteristics of the studied hospital. (Copyright © 2022 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu