Detection of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in ticks collected from South Russia.

Autor: Tsapko NV; Laboratory of Medical parasitology, Stavropol Research Anti-Plague Institute, Stavropol, 13-15 Sovetskaya Str., Stavropol 355035, Russian Federation. Electronic address: capko-1982@yandex.ru., Volynkina AS; Laboratory of Medical parasitology, Stavropol Research Anti-Plague Institute, Stavropol, 13-15 Sovetskaya Str., Stavropol 355035, Russian Federation., Evchenko AY; Laboratory of Medical parasitology, Stavropol Research Anti-Plague Institute, Stavropol, 13-15 Sovetskaya Str., Stavropol 355035, Russian Federation., Lisitskaya YV; Laboratory of Medical parasitology, Stavropol Research Anti-Plague Institute, Stavropol, 13-15 Sovetskaya Str., Stavropol 355035, Russian Federation., Shaposhnikova LI; Laboratory of Medical parasitology, Stavropol Research Anti-Plague Institute, Stavropol, 13-15 Sovetskaya Str., Stavropol 355035, Russian Federation.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Ticks and tick-borne diseases [Ticks Tick Borne Dis] 2022 Mar; Vol. 13 (2), pp. 101890. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Dec 20.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2021.101890
Abstrakt: Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) has a central role among tick-borne infections in southern Russia. Multiple cases of disease are recorded annually in most regions with the СCHF foci; moreover, an expansion of the geographic range of the disease has been noted. Since 1999, more than 2300 people have fallen ill in Russia. Ticks are the main vectors and reservoirs of the Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV). As it is currently known, CCHFV has been detected in ticks of 33 species. In the period 2012-2019 in the south of the European part of Russia, more than 38,000 ticks of 14 species of the genera Hyalomma, Rhipicephalus, Dermacentor, Haemaphysalis and Ixodes were tested for the presence of CCHFV. Among 4,188 tick pools studied, the virus was detected in 252 (6%). The main vector, as expected, is H. marginatum (81% of positive pools). The same species is the most numerous among the studied ticks (66%). Apart from H. marginatum, the virus was detected in the following species: H. scupense, R. rossicus, R. turanicus, R. bursa, R. annulatus, D. marginatus, Haem. punctata and Ixodes ricinus. Most of the positive results were obtained from ticks collected from vertebrate hosts. As for H. marginatum, R. rossicus, D. marginatus, and Haem. punctata, the virus was detected in questing unfed specimens collected from vegetation and soil surface, which indicates the participation of these ticks in the circulation of the virus.
(Copyright © 2021 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: