Electronically controlled cooling pads can improve litter growth performance and indirect measures of milk production in heat-stressed lactating sows.

Autor:	Johnson JS; USDA-ARS Livestock Behavior Research Unit, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA., Jansen TL; Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA., Galvin M; Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA., Field TC; Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA., Graham JR; Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA., Stwalley RM; Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA., Schinckel AP; Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of animal science [J Anim Sci] 2022 Feb 01; Vol. 100 (2).
DOI:	10.1093/jas/skab371
Abstrakt:	Heat stress (HS) decreases lactation output in sows due to an attempt to reduce metabolic heat production. However, this negatively affects litter growth performance. Therefore, the study objective was to determine whether electronically controlled cooling pads (ECP) would improve indirect measures of lactation output (e.g., total heat production [THP]) and litter growth performance in HS exposed sows. Over two repetitions, 12 multiparous (2.69 ± 0.85) lactating sows (265.4 ± 26.1 kg body weight [BW]) and litters were assigned to either an ECP (n = 3/repetition) or a non-functional ECP (NECP; n = 3/repetition) and placed into farrowing crates within indirect calorimeters from days 3.7 ± 0.5 to 18.7 ± 0.5 of lactation. Litters were standardized across all sows (11.4 ± 0.7 piglets/litter), and sows were provided ad libitum feed and water. All sows were exposed to cyclical HS (28.27 ± 0.26 °C nighttime to 33.09 ± 0.19°C daytime). On days 4, 8, 14, and 18 of lactation, indirect calorimetry was performed on each individual sow and litter to determine THP and THP/kg BW0.75. Body temperature (TB) was measured hourly using vaginal implants, and respiration rate (RR; breaths per minute [bpm]) was measured daily at 0700, 1100, 1300, 1500, and 1900 h. Sow feed intake (FI) was assessed daily. Litter weights were obtained at birth, on days 4, 8, 14, and 18 of lactation, and at weaning. Data were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX with sow and/or litter as the experimental unit. An overall decrease (P < 0.01; 25 bpm) in RR and maximum daily TB (P = 0.02; 0.40 °C) was observed in ECP vs. NECP sows. An increase in THP (P < 0.01; 20.4%) and THP/kg BW0.75 (P < 0.01; 23.1%) was observed for ECP when compared with NECP sows and litters. Litter average daily gain and weaning weight were increased (P < 0.05; 25.0 and 19.2%, respectively) for ECP vs. NECP litters. No FI differences were observed (P = 0.40) when comparing ECP (5.66 ± 0.31 kg/d) and NECP (5.28 ± 0.31 kg/d) sows. In summary, ECPs improve litter growth, thermoregulatory measures, and bioenergetic parameters associated with greater milk production in lactating sows exposed to cyclical HS. (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science 2021.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu