Prediction of Distal Femur and Proximal Tibia Bone Mineral Density From Total Body Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scans in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury.

Autor:	Ghatas MP; Spinal Cord Injury and Disorders Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA., Sutor TW; Spinal Cord Injury and Disorders Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA., Gorgey AS; Spinal Cord Injury and Disorders Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. Electronic address: ashraf.gorgey@va.gov.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry [J Clin Densitom] 2022 Apr-Jun; Vol. 25 (2), pp. 252-260. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Nov 13.
DOI:	10.1016/j.jocd.2021.11.003
Abstrakt:	Bone density decreases rapidly after spinal cord injury (SCI), increasing fracture risk. The most common fracture sites are at the knee (i.e., distal femur or proximal tibia). Despite this high fracture incidence, knee-specific scans for bone density using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were not available until 2014 and are still not routinely used in clinical practice today. This has made it difficult to determine the rehabilitation efficacy and hindered understanding of the long-term changes in knee areal bone density. The purpose of this investigation was to compare areal bone mineral density values for the knee from both total-body and knee-specific DXA scans in persons with SCI. A total of 20 participants (16 males) >1 yr-post spinal cord injury received two DXA scans; a total-body scan and a knee-specific scan. Standardized methods were used to create regions of interest to determine bone density of four regions - the epiphysis and metaphysis of the distal femur and proximal tibia - from the total-body scan. Linear regressions and Bland-Altman analyses were conducted to determine the correlation (r 2 ) and agreement (mean bias ± 95% level of agreement) respectively between the two scan types for each region. Linear regression analyses showed strong significant (p < 0.001) relationships between the two scan types for the distal femur epiphysis (r 2  = 0.88) and metaphysis (r 2  = 0.98) and the proximal tibia epiphysis (r 2  = 0.88) and metaphysis (r 2  = 0.99). The mean bias ± 95% level of agreement were distal femur epiphysis (0.05 ± 0.1 g/cm 2 ) and metaphysis (0.02 ± 0.04 g/cm 2 ); proximal tibia epiphysis (-0.02 ± 0.1 g/cm 2 ) and metaphysis (0.02 ± 0.03 g/cm 2 ). Results suggest knee-specific bone density can be assessed using a total-body DXA scan. This may allow for more comprehensive use of DXA scans which would reduce the burden of multiple site-specific scans for persons with SCI and enable more widespread adoption of knee bone density assessment in this population. (Copyright © 2021 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu