A systematic review of facial plastic surgery simulation training models.
| Autor: | Mohd Slim MA; Department of ENT, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK., Hurley R; Department of ENT, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK., Lechner M; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford School of Medicine, California, USA., Milner TD; Department of ENT, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK., Okhovat S; University of British Columbia Division of Otolaryngology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | The Journal of laryngology and otology [J Laryngol Otol] 2022 Mar; Vol. 136 (3), pp. 197-207. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Dec 16. |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S0022215121004151 |
| Abstrakt: | Objectives: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has led to a need for alternative teaching methods in facial plastics. This systematic review aimed to identify facial plastics simulation models, and assess their validity and efficacy as training tools. Methods: Literature searches were performed. The Beckman scale was used for validity. The McGaghie Modified Translational Outcomes of Simulation-Based Mastery Learning score was used to evaluate effectiveness. Results: Overall, 29 studies were selected. These simulated local skin flaps (n = 9), microtia frameworks (n = 5), pinnaplasty (n = 1), facial nerve anastomosis (n = 1), oculoplastic procedures (n = 5), and endoscopic septoplasty and septorhinoplasty simulators (n = 10). Of these models, 14 were deemed to be high-fidelity, 13 low-fidelity and 2 mixed-fidelity. None of the studies published common outcome measures. Conclusion: Simulators in facial plastic surgical training are important. These models may have some training benefits, but most could benefit from further assessment of validity. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|