Finding blood in the dark: A comparison of infrared imaging devices for the detection of bloodstains on dark fabrics based on their resolution.
Autor: | Hart AJ; Forensic Services, Metropolitan Police Service, 109 Lambeth Road, London SE1 7LP, UK. Electronic address: Andrew.Hart2@met.police.uk., Barnes GC; Strategy and Governance, New Scotland Yard, Metropolitan Police Service, Victoria Embankment, London SW1A 2JL, UK., Fuller F; Forensic Services, Metropolitan Police Service, 109 Lambeth Road, London SE1 7LP, UK., Cornwell AM; Forensic Services, Metropolitan Police Service, 109 Lambeth Road, London SE1 7LP, UK., Gyula J; Forensic Services, Metropolitan Police Service, 109 Lambeth Road, London SE1 7LP, UK., Marsh NP; Forensic Services, Metropolitan Police Service, 109 Lambeth Road, London SE1 7LP, UK. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Forensic science international [Forensic Sci Int] 2022 Jan; Vol. 330, pp. 111124. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Nov 26. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111124 |
Abstrakt: | The use of infrared (IR) light to locate bloodstains on dark fabric is a search technique that is employed in forensic examinations in a number of organisations worldwide. IR is used to complement existing, established visual white light search techniques. There exist a variety of commercially available products that can be purchased for this purpose as well as the option of using IR-converted standard DSLR (Digital Single Lens Reflex) cameras. In this study, a number of IR systems with contrasting resolutions were explored and their performance was assessed on a variety of bloodstain types and fabrics in comparison with white light. The systems ranged from low-budget, low resolution options, such as portable webcams, to vision-industry standard, high resolution, purpose-built cameras for more detailed blood searching of suitable items in the laboratory. Blood spatter, transfer bloodstains, dilute bloodstains, blood mixed with other body fluids and environmental contaminants were among the samples tested on eight different dark fabric types under IR conditions to assess the impact of the resolution differences. All IR systems were able to locate bloodstains, with significantly more bloodstains being found with IR compared to white light. The higher resolution systems were able to locate significantly more bloodstains than the systems with the lower resolution. The webcams were able to locate many of the larger areas of bloodstaining but performed less well in terms of locating smaller bloodstains and dilute blood. False positives such as mud, make-up and brown sauce were detected under IR but were readily discriminated under white light and with presumptive chemical tests. The balance between the ability to locate bloodstains based on system resolution and practicality and possible efficiency gains is discussed. Competing Interests: Declarations of interest None. (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |